Sculpt Mode: Inconsistent cavity auto-masking results #102745
Labels
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender#102745
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Operating system: Linux-5.15.0-53-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35 64 Bits
Graphics card: Quadro GP100/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 510.85.02
Blender Version
Broken: version: 3.5.0 Alpha, branch: master, commit date: 2022-11-24 09:15, hash:
bbf09eb59cWorked: (newest version of Blender that worked as expected)
Short description of error
When using Cavity auto-masking the results can be different each time when executed, even though the mesh has not changed.
This can be observed when using the Mesh Filter tool with the Inflate tool setting.
Enable Cavity auto-masking in the header and repeatedly execute the tool by click & dragging to the right, and undoing the action.
The second of these images was the most common result for me.
Each time I executed the tool my mouse cursor started at a different position on the screen, which might, but should not influence the result.
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Added subscriber: @JulienKaspar
Added subscriber: @iss
Checked with
f4e1f62c62and can't reproduce. Can you share .blend file?Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
I also noticed this while testing my patch D16583
Will mark this as confirmed.
@iss, can you reproduce in the attached file?
#102745.blend
I can reproduce. Perhaps I tested outdated build (could not build master at that time).
I assume this is still not resolved right? Also not with
1184501d5cSomething similar has been reported in #112951
No this hasn't been resolved yet. The mentioned report seems to be a duplicate (or just confusion about the auto-masking setting being enabled).