Rigify Documentation shows no images #90779
Labels
No Label
Meta
Good First Issue
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
Eevee & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Module
Python API
Module
Rendering & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Information from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-manual#90779
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Pagename:
addons/rigging/rigify/basics
Blender Version:
2.93
Documentation Language:
en
Permanent link
Short description of error
Images seem to be linked in the source, but aren't showing up. Incorrect paths?
The old Japanese documentation still has them, btw. https://wiki.blender.jp/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Rigging/Rigify
Added subscriber: @TheOldBen
Added subscriber: @Blendify
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'
Can you have a look at the updated 3.0 documentation? This should be fixed already
https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/3.0/addons/rigging/rigify/index.html
Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Archived'
No activity for more than a week. As per the tracker policy we assume the issue is gone and can be closed.
Thanks again for the report. If the problem persists please open a new report with the required information.
The 3.0 documentation shows them as intended. That is not the case for 2.93 on the other hand.