Bevel Bug - Weird Geometry Position #40278

New Issue

Vlad Mafteiu Scai · 2014-05-20T11:50:44+02:00

Vlad Mafteiu Scai commented

2014-05-20 11:50:44 +02:00

System Information
Win 8 64, 2x MSI Lightning{

Blender Version
Broken: (example: 2.70, c08c931, see splash screen)
Worked: (optional)

Weird Geometry Position when using modifier. Check Blend File{F89499}

Not sure if it has been reported before but here it is.

Do I get a bonus for reporting lots of bugs in a certain section? :D I have like 4-6 so far for the bevel tool/mod

**System Information** Win 8 64, 2x MSI Lightning{ **Blender Version** Broken: (example: 2.70, c08c931, see splash screen) Worked: (optional) **Weird Geometry Position when using modifier. Check Blend File{[F89499](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F89499/bug_4.blend)}** Not sure if it has been reported before but here it is. Do I get a bonus for reporting lots of bugs in a certain section? :D I have like 4-6 so far for the bevel tool/mod

Vlad Mafteiu Scai commented

2014-05-20 11:50:44 +02:00

Changed status to: 'Open'

Howard Trickey was assigned by Vlad Mafteiu Scai

2014-05-20 11:50:44 +02:00

Vlad Mafteiu Scai commented

2014-05-20 11:50:44 +02:00

Added subscriber: @00Ghz

Bastien Montagne commented

2014-05-20 15:33:47 +02:00

Added subscriber: @mont29

Bastien Montagne commented

2014-05-20 15:34:44 +02:00

Howard, will let you decide whether this is a new case or a duplicate of another one. ;)

Fazekas Laszlo commented

2014-05-26 09:11:17 +02:00

Added subscriber: @totoro-4

Fazekas Laszlo commented

2014-05-26 09:11:17 +02:00

In the sample scene if you change the Profile parameter of the modifier, the wild thing happens at 1.0 and 0.25 for me (better visible if you increase the number of segments). But some of the object's quad faces are not flat...

Howard Trickey commented

2014-06-15 02:47:28 +02:00

I think the complaint here is that with bevel profile 1.0 or 0.25, where the edge bevels are square or flat, respectively, then the corners are not flat or square. Is that right?
The 1.0 case is known to be problematic. There is another bug about that.
The 0.25 case: I suppose I could project the corner pattern on the the quad formed by the four corners of the valence-4 vertices, if that quad is flat. But that's a special case. In general the corner polygon will not be flat.

I think the complaint here is that with bevel profile 1.0 or 0.25, where the edge bevels are square or flat, respectively, then the corners are not flat or square. Is that right? The 1.0 case is known to be problematic. There is another bug about that. The 0.25 case: I suppose I could project the corner pattern on the the quad formed by the four corners of the valence-4 vertices, if that quad is flat. But that's a special case. In general the corner polygon will not be flat.

Julian Eisel commented

2015-03-17 20:34:50 +01:00

Added subscribers: @howardt, @JulianEisel