Discrepancy in release process #41280

Closed
opened 2014-08-01 08:04:47 +02:00 by Shane Ambler · 11 comments

Blender Version
Broken: 2.71 binary release
Worked: 2.71 source tarball

It appears there is an issue with the release process. While at least two features are known to exist in the official 2.71 release source tarball, they do not appear in 2.71 binary releases.

On 16 June commit 8c16f4c7d0 added
BGE: New Property sensor evaluation types
This patch adds "Less Than" and "Greater Than" evaluation types to the property sensor.

On 13 June commit 3de3987ea1 added
Cycles: Add dedicated nodes to split/combine vectors.

According to the blender download page and the 2.71 tag creation - 2.71 was released on 26 June so these two could be expected to be included.

My build from the release tarball has both of these features (I'm on FreeBSD so I don't have an official binary release to test). I have had two separate people say that one of these is not present and a third person confirm that both are not present in a binary release of 2.71

This leads to the question - do the release builds get final bug fixes before release? are any new bugs introduced through other commits that shouldn't be added to release?

**Blender Version** Broken: 2.71 binary release Worked: 2.71 source tarball It appears there is an issue with the release process. While at least two features are known to exist in the official 2.71 release source tarball, they do not appear in 2.71 binary releases. On 16 June commit 8c16f4c7d0 added BGE: New Property sensor evaluation types This patch adds "Less Than" and "Greater Than" evaluation types to the property sensor. On 13 June commit 3de3987ea1 added Cycles: Add dedicated nodes to split/combine vectors. According to the blender download page and the 2.71 tag creation - 2.71 was released on 26 June so these two could be expected to be included. My build from the release tarball has both of these features (I'm on FreeBSD so I don't have an official binary release to test). I have had two separate people say that one of these is not present and a third person confirm that both are not present in a binary release of 2.71 This leads to the question - do the release builds get final bug fixes before release? are any new bugs introduced through other commits that shouldn't be added to release?
Author

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Author

Added subscriber: @sambler

Added subscriber: @sambler

Added subscriber: @Sergey

Added subscriber: @Sergey

You've got wrong assumption here, only features which existed at the time of rc1 are to be expected in the final release. Only crucial fixes made after the rc1 tag are backported to the final release. And rc1 was created 13th jun.

So the issue is that the source tarball is created from the master branch, not the release tag.

You've got wrong assumption here, only features which existed at the time of rc1 are to be expected in the final release. Only crucial fixes made after the rc1 tag are backported to the final release. And rc1 was created 13th jun. So the issue is that the source tarball is created from the master branch, not the release tag.
Member

Added subscriber: @gandalf3

Added subscriber: @gandalf3

Added subscriber: @mont29

Added subscriber: @mont29
Member

Added subscriber: @KentMein

Added subscriber: @KentMein
Member

I use a perl script to generate the files and it does basically the following:
$VERSION = "v2.71"
git clone --recursive git://git.blender.org/blender.git blender-$VERSION
cd blender-$VERSION;git fetch --tags
git submodule foreach git fetch --tags
git checkout $VERSION
git submodule update --recursive

rm -rf blender-$VERSION/.git blender-$VERSION/.???*
/bin/tar cfvz blender-$VERSION.tar.gz blender-$VERSION

I'll check it to see whats going on.

I use a perl script to generate the files and it does basically the following: $VERSION = "v2.71" git clone --recursive git://git.blender.org/blender.git blender-$VERSION cd blender-$VERSION;git fetch --tags git submodule foreach git fetch --tags git checkout $VERSION git submodule update --recursive rm -rf blender-$VERSION/.git blender-$VERSION/.???* /bin/tar cfvz blender-$VERSION.tar.gz blender-$VERSION I'll check it to see whats going on.
Member

I'm not entirely sure what happened here. I reran the script again and it produced a tar file that is
different than the current one. I took a look at two files from the mentioned patches and it is
indeed different.

When I check the timestamp on the file:

ls -ld blender-2.71.tar.gz

  • rw-rw-r-- 1 mein wheel 57120144 Jun 27 14:23 blender-2.71.tar.gz

my guess is that I maybe ran the tar earlier than the tag, or there were changes made to the tag after
the tagging later... In general though the sources are created from the tag. since we remove the
.git dir from the source before uploading it, I can't do much more debugging. I'm open to suggestions on how to change things to avoid issues in the future though.

I'm going to update the source now so that it matches whats tagged.

Kent

I'm not entirely sure what happened here. I reran the script again and it produced a tar file that is different than the current one. I took a look at two files from the mentioned patches and it is indeed different. When I check the timestamp on the file: ls -ld blender-2.71.tar.gz - rw-rw-r-- 1 mein wheel 57120144 Jun 27 14:23 blender-2.71.tar.gz my guess is that I maybe ran the tar earlier than the tag, or there were changes made to the tag after the tagging later... In general though the sources are created from the tag. since we remove the .git dir from the source before uploading it, I can't do much more debugging. I'm open to suggestions on how to change things to avoid issues in the future though. I'm going to update the source now so that it matches whats tagged. Kent
Member

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
Member

I resolved this, I've updated the source and I'll add a step to make sure the tag is there before uploading just to be safe.

I resolved this, I've updated the source and I'll add a step to make sure the tag is there before uploading just to be safe.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#41280
No description provided.