Shape of vertex-only bevels is distorted: edges should be curved but are straight #49173

Closed
opened 2016-08-27 04:36:52 +02:00 by Stephen Parry · 11 comments

System Information
W10 ATI Radeon Mobility HD 5000 Series

Blender Version
Broken: 2.77a abf6f08

Short description of error
When creating a vertex-only bevel via mesh edit or a modifier, the outer edges of the bevel are created as straight lines rather than smooth curves, creating a distorted shape.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Load default scene (File -> New -> [Enter])
RMB -> Cube
3D View -> Properties -> Modifiers Tab -> Add Modifier -> Bevel:
Width: 0.25
Segments: 8
Profile: 0.5
Material: -1
Ticked: Only Vertices
Ticked: Clamp Overlap
Ticked: Loop Slide

This produces a bevel that looks like the first attached image:
bad-bevel.png
The outer edges of the bevel are straight and end in an angle. This is not of any use.

The second attached image gives some idea of what the bevel should look like. The outer edges were created by edge splitting the cube then bevelling the resulting planes, which gives the correct outer shape, but leaves a hole. The mesh in-fill was hand crafted and then spherified.
better-bevel.png
If the code that is used to bevel the vertices of a 2d plane was used to generate the starting point (the outer edge) of the 3d vertex bevel, I think the results would look much better.

Both blender files are attached: bad-bevel.blend better-bevel-2.blend

**System Information** W10 ATI Radeon Mobility HD 5000 Series **Blender Version** Broken: 2.77a abf6f08 **Short description of error** When creating a vertex-only bevel via mesh edit or a modifier, the outer edges of the bevel are created as straight lines rather than smooth curves, creating a distorted shape. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** Load default scene (File -> New -> [Enter]) RMB -> Cube 3D View -> Properties -> Modifiers Tab -> Add Modifier -> Bevel: Width: 0.25 Segments: 8 Profile: 0.5 Material: -1 Ticked: Only Vertices Ticked: Clamp Overlap Ticked: Loop Slide This produces a bevel that looks like the first attached image: ![bad-bevel.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F344186/bad-bevel.png) The outer edges of the bevel are straight and end in an angle. This is not of any use. The second attached image gives some idea of what the bevel should look like. The outer edges were created by edge splitting the cube then bevelling the resulting planes, which gives the correct outer shape, but leaves a hole. The mesh in-fill was hand crafted and then spherified. ![better-bevel.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F344184/better-bevel.png) If the code that is used to bevel the vertices of a 2d plane was used to generate the starting point (the outer edge) of the 3d vertex bevel, I think the results would look much better. Both blender files are attached: [bad-bevel.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F344180/bad-bevel.blend) [better-bevel-2.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F344181/better-bevel-2.blend)
Author

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Author

Added subscriber: @mutant0407

Added subscriber: @mutant0407

Added subscriber: @SpectreFirst

Added subscriber: @SpectreFirst

Probably something like this would suffice? The only difference from current bevel is curved borders.
Multisegment_Bevel.png

Probably something like this would suffice? The only difference from current bevel is curved borders. ![Multisegment_Bevel.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F345894/Multisegment_Bevel.png)

Added subscribers: @howardt, @Sergey

Added subscribers: @howardt, @Sergey
Howard Trickey was assigned by Sergey Sharybin 2016-08-29 10:10:52 +02:00

@howardt, mind having a look here? Thanks :)

@howardt, mind having a look here? Thanks :)
Member

I call this a feature request, not a bug, since the current behavior is working as designed (though not, as this bug shows, as some users would like). Others have asked for this. While it may seem clear what to do in a case as shown (convex corner of a polyhedron), other cases are not so clear. For instance, what to do if the vertex is in a plane? I can see some users preferring the inward curving edges as you request here; some might prefer outward curving ones (to make a kind of circular shape), while still others may prefer the current flat straight line behavior.

I'm going to close this and add the request to the general feature request/improve bevel design task, #48583. Currently I've got another feature request that I'm working on (slowly), but hope to get to this some time after that.

I call this a feature request, not a bug, since the current behavior is working as designed (though not, as this bug shows, as some users would like). Others have asked for this. While it may seem clear what to do in a case as shown (convex corner of a polyhedron), other cases are not so clear. For instance, what to do if the vertex is in a plane? I can see some users preferring the inward curving edges as you request here; some might prefer outward curving ones (to make a kind of circular shape), while still others may prefer the current flat straight line behavior. I'm going to close this and add the request to the general feature request/improve bevel design task, #48583. Currently I've got another feature request that I'm working on (slowly), but hope to get to this some time after that.
Member

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'
Author

Perhaps you could either go with the existing profile parameter or have two profile parameters, one for the edges, the other for the midpoint and then interpolate between.

Perhaps you could either go with the existing profile parameter or have two profile parameters, one for the edges, the other for the midpoint and then interpolate between.
Author

@howardt Thanks for working on this; I appreciate it. I did try it as a feature request - but got bounced rather rudely around blenderartists by one of the moderators who didn't get where I was coming from.

@SpectreFirst - No the whole surface is distorted, not just the edges. I got my 'improved' version using a sphere to give the shape.

@howardt Thanks for working on this; I appreciate it. I did try it as a feature request - but got bounced rather rudely around blenderartists by one of the moderators who didn't get where I was coming from. @SpectreFirst - No the whole surface is distorted, not just the edges. I got my 'improved' version using a sphere to give the shape.
Author

@howardt - I just checked planar vertex bevels (as you mentioned); they already obey the profile parameter, so you get:
0=concave circular bevel
0.25 = straight diagonal edge
0.5 = convex circular bevel
1 = corner
Which is a good range.

Likewise, 3d edge bevels are pretty flexible, although some engineers might request varying radius or profile.

The only big deficit is the 3D vertex bevels. It would make a lot more sense if the edge curves at least followed the profile parameter, so
0 = concave surface with concave edges profile
0.25 - flat with straight edges
0.5 = convex approx spherical with convex circular edge profile
1 = sharp corner

This means the edges would behave exactly as in the 2D case.

@howardt - I just checked planar vertex bevels (as you mentioned); they already obey the profile parameter, so you get: 0=concave circular bevel 0.25 = straight diagonal edge 0.5 = convex circular bevel 1 = corner Which is a good range. Likewise, 3d edge bevels are pretty flexible, although some engineers might request varying radius or profile. The only big deficit is the 3D vertex bevels. It would make a lot more sense if the edge curves at least followed the profile parameter, so 0 = concave surface with concave edges profile 0.25 - flat with straight edges 0.5 = convex approx spherical with convex circular edge profile 1 = sharp corner This means the edges would behave exactly as in the 2D case.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#49173
No description provided.