Smoke Emission from particles is ignoring lattice deformer on the particles #55105

Closed
opened 2018-05-17 02:45:49 +02:00 by Kamran Chahkar · 9 comments

System Information
Windows and AMD Redeon Duo Pro (Bad!!)

**Blender Version 2.79b
Worked: (optional)

*Short description of-When we influences a particle system with a FFD (Lattice), and that one assigns a Smoke Domain to the Group Particle, the Domain and is not infuensing by the FFD that influences the particle system end supos tu drive the Smook Domain.

Tahnks

**System Information** Windows and AMD Redeon Duo Pro (Bad!!) **Blender Version 2.79b Worked: (optional) **Short description of-When we influences a particle system with a FFD (Lattice), and that one assigns a Smoke Domain to the Group Particle, the Domain and is not infuensing by the FFD that influences the particle system end supos tu drive the Smook Domain.* Tahnks
Author

Added subscriber: @Ima-klip

Added subscriber: @Ima-klip
Member

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Member

Cannot really tell what exactly the problem is from the report description.
Could you please share a simple .blend file that demonstrates the issue? (and explain again what the expected behaviour would be -- opposed to the behaviour that can be observed)?

Marking as incomplete for the time being.

Cannot really tell what exactly the problem is from the report description. Could you please share a simple .blend file that demonstrates the issue? (and explain again what the expected behaviour would be -- opposed to the behaviour that can be observed)? Marking as incomplete for the time being.
Author

Jett-V04.blend

Thank you for answering so quickly Philipp ;). I share with you the file .blend as you ask me.

I change the influence of particule system with a Lattic, the particles are well influenced by the Lattice, But I add a Smook Domain to the particle.I noticed that the Lattice which influences the particles (which makes it curved) has no effect on the Smook Domain. Tell me if I forgot a step or if it's a bug.

Thank you very much

Also, I work with a team that uses Maya, I come back from the day to send Alembic particle files. But in maya the particle system does not exist. Is there a way to export them?

Thanks to all the Blender team

[Jett-V04.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F3382319/Jett-V04.blend) Thank you for answering so quickly Philipp ;). I share with you the file .blend as you ask me. I change the influence of particule system with a Lattic, the particles are well influenced by the Lattice, But I add a Smook Domain to the particle.I noticed that the Lattice which influences the particles (which makes it curved) has no effect on the Smook Domain. Tell me if I forgot a step or if it's a bug. Thank you very much Also, I work with a team that uses Maya, I come back from the day to send Alembic particle files. But in maya the particle system does not exist. Is there a way to export them? Thanks to all the Blender team
Member

Will look into this again shortly

Will look into this again shortly
Philipp Oeser self-assigned this 2018-05-18 16:21:03 +02:00
Member

I'm not sure (yet) if this was left out intentionally, but it lattice influence was just ignored...
Confirming this though and investigate if there is something speaking something like D3397 (which is working fine in my tests).

I'm not sure (yet) if this was left out intentionally, but it lattice influence was just ignored... Confirming this though and investigate if there is something speaking something like [D3397](https://archive.blender.org/developer/D3397) (which is working fine in my tests).
Philipp Oeser changed title from Particule to Smoke Emission from particles is ignoring lattice deformer on the particles 2018-05-18 16:21:43 +02:00
Member

I'll look into Alembic separately

I'll look into Alembic separately

This issue was referenced by d542e55b09

This issue was referenced by d542e55b096ba3d8e14cac2e4d314f0a5e759982
Member

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Resolved'
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#55105
No description provided.