glTF 2.0 importer / exporter #57763
Labels
No Label
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Blender Cloud
Interest
Collada
Interest
Core
Interest
Documentation
Interest
Eevee & Viewport
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
Import and Export
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds, Tests & Devices
Interest
Python API
Interest
Rendering & Cycles
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Translations
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Module
Add-ons (BF-Blender)
Module
Add-ons (Community)
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender-addons#57763
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Importer / Exporter of gltf2 files.io_scene_gltf2.zip
This addon is developed by KhronosGroup.
Here is current development git & documentation:
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glTF-Blender-IO
Added subscriber: @JulienDuroure
For long term development and maintenance, we will have daily changes and fixes in the github repository. If we have a major and/or critical update, we also want to provide and integrate it into future versions of Blender.
Hi Julien, please create a differential instead (https://developer.blender.org/differential/diff/create/), it’s much easier to review. (I know the 'submit new addon' creates a new task… :/ ).
Only did a very quick overview, one thing that we should not accept I think is the double 2.7x/2.8x compatibility inside a same code. I understand the logic behind that for an external add-on, but it adds some overhead and clutter to the code, and the ones shipped with Blender should never care about that (since they are only expected to be working with the version they are released with).
Hello Bastien,
OK, I will create a diff.
Note that zip I submitted has no double compatibility (you probably read files from github that have this double stuff).
@mont29 Here is the diff : https://developer.blender.org/differential/diff/12493/
Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'
Hi @JulienDuroure : thnx for submitting this (very welcome addition).
Since this is now in Differential and in review, I think we can close this task (to only have discussion in one place)?