Cryptomatte - File Output node is messing up the multilayer exr (metadata), so blender cryptomattes cannot be read properly in external compositors #64953

Closed
opened 2019-05-21 17:13:06 +02:00 by Marcus Papathoma · 76 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.17134 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 419.35

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.80 (sub 71), branch: blender2.7, commit date: 2019-05-20 22:03, hash: e787700393
Worked: (optional)

Short description of error
Cryptomatte - File Output node is messing up the multilayer exr, so blender cryptomattes are not working in the compositing app Blackmagic Fusion 9.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Open the attached blend-file.
Hit render animation.
Two files are generated within the tmp folder.
One from the compositor file output node (Cubes_Cryptomatte_test_FileOutput_0001.exr)
Cryptomatte_Fusion_01.JPG
and one from the core output in the output properties (Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_0001.exr).
Cryptomatte_Fusion_02.JPG
As you can see on the filesize of these multilayer exrs, they are not the same, but should?!
If you try to use the cryptomatte channels in these files in the free compositing app Blackmagic Fusion 9 only the cryptomattes frome the one, which wasn´t save though the file output node, works correct.

Is the file output node in the blender compositor changing something in the multilayer exr?
Cryptomatte_test_01.blend
In Fusion Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_0001.exr - The Channel IDs are recognized by Fusion.
Cryptomatte_Fusion_03.JPG
In Fusion Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_FileOutput_0001.exr - The Channel IDs are not recognized by Fusion.
Cryptomatte_Fusion_04.JPG
The error message whithin Fusion.
Cryptomatte_Fusion_05.JPG

**System Information** Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.17134 64 Bits Graphics card: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 419.35 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.80 (sub 71), branch: blender2.7, commit date: 2019-05-20 22:03, hash: `e787700393` Worked: (optional) **Short description of error** Cryptomatte - File Output node is messing up the multilayer exr, so blender cryptomattes are not working in the compositing app Blackmagic Fusion 9. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** Open the attached blend-file. Hit render animation. Two files are generated within the tmp folder. One from the compositor file output node (Cubes_Cryptomatte_test_FileOutput_0001.exr) ![Cryptomatte_Fusion_01.JPG](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057615/Cryptomatte_Fusion_01.JPG) and one from the core output in the output properties (Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_0001.exr). ![Cryptomatte_Fusion_02.JPG](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057618/Cryptomatte_Fusion_02.JPG) As you can see on the filesize of these multilayer exrs, they are not the same, but should?! If you try to use the cryptomatte channels in these files in the free compositing app Blackmagic Fusion 9 only the cryptomattes frome the one, which wasn´t save though the file output node, works correct. Is the **file output node in the blender compositor changing something in the multilayer exr**? [Cryptomatte_test_01.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057657/Cryptomatte_test_01.blend) In Fusion Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_0001.exr - The Channel IDs are recognized by Fusion. ![Cryptomatte_Fusion_03.JPG](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057793/Cryptomatte_Fusion_03.JPG) In Fusion Cryptomatte_Cubes_test_FileOutput_0001.exr - The Channel IDs are not recognized by Fusion. ![Cryptomatte_Fusion_04.JPG](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057812/Cryptomatte_Fusion_04.JPG) The error message whithin Fusion. ![Cryptomatte_Fusion_05.JPG](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F7057822/Cryptomatte_Fusion_05.JPG)

Added subscriber: @machieb

Added subscriber: @machieb

#72732 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#72732 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#72673 was marked as duplicate of this issue

#72673 was marked as duplicate of this issue

Added subscriber: @MaciejJutrzenka

Added subscriber: @MaciejJutrzenka

fusion cryptomatte plugin is trash generally... i had problems with cryptomatte from clarisse and also from houdini with fusion.. if the project is a bit bigger it simply don't work anymore.

fusion cryptomatte plugin is trash generally... i had problems with cryptomatte from clarisse and also from houdini with fusion.. if the project is a bit bigger it simply don't work anymore.

Yes maybe the plugin in trash but I think the fileoutput in blender should be the same, if you use a fileoutput node or not.
Comparing the metadata or the exr-header may show what is different amongst the two outputs.
Otherwise if you have many renderlayers you are not able to render them into different files if you want to use cryptomatte in another compositing app.
Look into this thread https://blenderartists.org/t/cryptomatte-is-here-amazing/1132013/
People have problems using cryptomattes from blender cycles in all the other compositing apps (Nuke, After Effects, Fusion).
Sorry, but the blender compositor is no alternative if you want to make highend compositing.
Today I testest cryptomattes from blender in After Effects. With the free ProEXR 2.0 Plugin it works fine but I need a node base compositing software.
I also tested Natron. The cryptomatte implementation in Natron works, but if you use aspecific nodes like glow together with the cryptomatte keyer, it crashes.
There are sample files from the cryptomatte inventor Psyop, which you can download from their githup page together with the cryptomatte plugins for nuke and fusion and they work fine.
So something is wrong with the blender cryptomatte implementation, maybe not following the standard as thought by Psyop?

Yes maybe the plugin in trash but I think the fileoutput in blender should be the same, if you use a fileoutput node or not. Comparing the metadata or the exr-header may show what is different amongst the two outputs. Otherwise if you have many renderlayers you are not able to render them into different files if you want to use cryptomatte in another compositing app. Look into this thread https://blenderartists.org/t/cryptomatte-is-here-amazing/1132013/ People have problems using cryptomattes from blender cycles in all the other compositing apps (Nuke, After Effects, Fusion). Sorry, but the blender compositor is no alternative if you want to make highend compositing. Today I testest cryptomattes from blender in After Effects. With the free ProEXR 2.0 Plugin it works fine but I need a node base compositing software. I also tested Natron. The cryptomatte implementation in Natron works, but if you use aspecific nodes like glow together with the cryptomatte keyer, it crashes. There are sample files from the cryptomatte inventor Psyop, which you can download from their githup page together with the cryptomatte plugins for nuke and fusion and they work fine. So something is wrong with the blender cryptomatte implementation, maybe not following the standard as thought by Psyop?

yeah i agree that meta data shuld have VFX standard and be same in both case. However i don't agree about compositings apps in general.. For me, the best is Nuke.. after that is Blender and very last is Fusion, that on big projects just chokes and generally performance is bad and anoying. it is mostly designed to work with TV stuff. not CGI. However it do have neat color gradeing tools.

yeah i agree that meta data shuld have VFX standard and be same in both case. However i don't agree about compositings apps in general.. For me, the best is Nuke.. after that is Blender and very last is Fusion, that on big projects just chokes and generally performance is bad and anoying. it is mostly designed to work with TV stuff. not CGI. However it do have neat color gradeing tools.

Nuke maybe the best, its industry standard I know and I would love to work with it, but my company can´t afford to pay nearly 4000€ per license.
Fusion 9 is free and Fusion 16 Studio is only 320€.

Nuke maybe the best, its industry standard I know and I would love to work with it, but my company can´t afford to pay nearly 4000€ per license. Fusion 9 is free and Fusion 16 Studio is only 320€.

Nuke is worth the money. Working in fusion is slow as hell, i wouldn't be suprsied if nuke artist would do job 2 times faster and better.

Nuke is worth the money. Working in fusion is slow as hell, i wouldn't be suprsied if nuke artist would do job 2 times faster and better.
Member

Added subscriber: @Jeroen-Bakker

Added subscriber: @Jeroen-Bakker
Member

Please keep on topic. Cluttering this site with non related information will not make us solve issues faster.

Not sure, but might be related to #63270?

Please keep on topic. Cluttering this site with non related information will not make us solve issues faster. Not sure, but might be related to #63270?

My problem is as mentioned in the description, that if I use a file output node in blender the cryptmatte informations in the multilayer exr change, so they can´t be read by the compositing app Fusion.
If I render without an output node, everything works fine in Fusion.
So my assumption is that the file output node changes IDs or metadata?!

My problem is as mentioned in the description, that if I use a file output node in blender the cryptmatte informations in the multilayer exr change, so they can´t be read by the compositing app Fusion. If I render without an output node, everything works fine in Fusion. So my assumption is that the file output node changes IDs or metadata?!
Member

Crypto matte meta data related to the naming of the layers. The compositor does not support meta data of render layers, or any meta data at all.
We should come up with a good design if we want to support using blender compositor for this.

Will put this as a TODO as it is currenlty not designed or implemented to support this.

Crypto matte meta data related to the naming of the layers. The compositor does not support meta data of render layers, or any meta data at all. We should come up with a good design if we want to support using blender compositor for this. Will put this as a TODO as it is currenlty not designed or implemented to support this.

If you have viewlayers, the file output node is the only way, to render them to different multilayer exr´s.
Otherwise every viewlayer and pass ends up in one multilayer exr. If you have to rerender one viewlayer, you are produceing new content not able to delete old renderings wihtin the multilayer exr.
In Blender it is then also not possible, to write only cryptomatte to a seperate exr-file, because without the file output node the combined pass is always written to file.
For me the FileOutput Node is very important when rendering viewlayer! Otherwise you have to render every viewlayer after each other, setting new output settings after each rendering. Thats not very efficient!
Is it not possible to make the fileoutput node the same behaviour than the regular output?

If you have viewlayers, the file output node is the only way, to render them to different multilayer exr´s. Otherwise every viewlayer and pass ends up in **one** multilayer exr. If you have to rerender one viewlayer, you are produceing new content not able to delete old renderings wihtin the multilayer exr. In Blender it is then also not possible, to write only cryptomatte to a seperate exr-file, because without the file output node the combined pass is always written to file. For me the FileOutput Node is very important when rendering viewlayer! Otherwise you have to render every viewlayer after each other, setting new output settings after each rendering. Thats not very efficient! Is it not possible to make the fileoutput node the same behaviour than the regular output?

Added subscriber: @Thiagodesul

Added subscriber: @Thiagodesul

I second this. I'm facing this problem in a project we're currently working on and again I have to find a workaround to solve something that doesn't work as it should in Blender.

I second this. I'm facing this problem in a project we're currently working on and again I have to find a workaround to solve something that doesn't work as it should in Blender.

Added subscriber: @SteffenD

Added subscriber: @SteffenD

Added subscriber: @RainerTrummer

Added subscriber: @RainerTrummer

Same problem on our side. This behavior of Metadata not being attached correctly to OpenEXR does not only affect File Output nodes it seems. Saving from the Image Editor to OpenEXR (MultiLayer) seems to show the same problem. Is the Metadata attached at all? Can someone confirm this?

Same problem on our side. This behavior of Metadata not being attached correctly to OpenEXR does not only affect File Output nodes it seems. Saving from the Image Editor to OpenEXR (MultiLayer) seems to show the same problem. Is the Metadata attached at all? Can someone confirm this?

FYI we are using Nuke for compositing, so the app on the other side doesn't seem to matter.

FYI we are using Nuke for compositing, so the app on the other side doesn't seem to matter.

If you want proper cryptomate IDs you can´t use the file output node. The cryptomates within images saved from the Image Editor work in Fusion 9/16 and in Photoshop (Exr-IO-Plugin). I tested it a few minutes ago. Sorry I can´t test it on Nuke.
Maybe the problem with the file output node will be adressed some day, because so you are forced to render every viewlayer in one multilayer-exr if you want to use cryptomattes, but I have given up hope!

If you want proper cryptomate IDs you can´t use the file output node. The cryptomates within images saved from the Image Editor work in Fusion 9/16 and in Photoshop (Exr-IO-Plugin). I tested it a few minutes ago. Sorry I can´t test it on Nuke. Maybe the problem with the file output node will be adressed some day, because so you are forced to render every viewlayer in one multilayer-exr if you want to use cryptomattes, but I have given up hope!

Added subscriber: @3di

Added subscriber: @3di

The developer of the exr io plugin has said that the issue is that blender is outputting the cryptomattes as images instead of data. Should be a really quick fix if this can get some attention from a developer.

https://devtalk.blender.org/t/cryptomatte-in-photoshop-issue-exr-io-plugin/8286/2

The developer of the exr io plugin has said that the issue is that blender is outputting the cryptomattes as images instead of data. Should be a really quick fix if this can get some attention from a developer. https://devtalk.blender.org/t/cryptomatte-in-photoshop-issue-exr-io-plugin/8286/2

Added subscriber: @filibis

Added subscriber: @filibis

From my point of view cryptomatte in Blender is working fine.
The problem in the moment is the file output node, that is not able to store them in the correct way like the main output does.

From my point of view cryptomatte in Blender is working fine. The problem in the moment is the file output node, that is not able to store them in the correct way like the main output does.

yeah, and it's a real pain the file output node doesnt have a save button too. Otherwise you could set up the masks in blender's compositor using the cryptomatte node, plug the mask output into a file node, and then press save on the file output node.

yeah, and it's a real pain the file output node doesnt have a save button too. Otherwise you could set up the masks in blender's compositor using the cryptomatte node, plug the mask output into a file node, and then press save on the file output node.

oh actually, just realised I can do this by plugging the mask output into a viewer node and saving it from the image editor.

Workaround to the file output node problem is to set up the multilayer exr in the properties panel, manually save the blender compositor output using the image editor. Then in the 3rd party software load in the exr from the properties panel, and load in the composited image saved from the image editor. Then you can use the properties cryptomatte to make further adjustments to the file blender composited image externally.

oh actually, just realised I can do this by plugging the mask output into a viewer node and saving it from the image editor. Workaround to the file output node problem is to set up the multilayer exr in the properties panel, manually save the blender compositor output using the image editor. Then in the 3rd party software load in the exr from the properties panel, and load in the composited image saved from the image editor. Then you can use the properties cryptomatte to make further adjustments to the file blender composited image externally.

Added subscriber: @Robert_B

Added subscriber: @Robert_B

I am frustrated. I try to integrate Blender into my work process. The inteldenoiser is wonderful. Cryptomatte is great. But I don't get both in a MultiLayer EXR file. The Denoiser can only be reached via compositing. And a functioning cryptomatte can only be obtained from the file output.
I eat my hair XD

I am frustrated. I try to integrate Blender into my work process. The inteldenoiser is wonderful. Cryptomatte is great. But I don't get both in a MultiLayer EXR file. The Denoiser can only be reached via compositing. And a functioning cryptomatte can only be obtained from the file output. I eat my hair XD

See https://devtalk.blender.org/t/cryptomatte-metadata-missing-in-2-8/5546/33
Brecht writes: "The Blender compositor indeed does not preserve metadata with the file output node, that’s a limitation currently, there is no type of metadata node socket for passing along that information from one node to another."

See https://devtalk.blender.org/t/cryptomatte-metadata-missing-in-2-8/5546/33 Brecht writes: "The Blender compositor indeed does not preserve metadata with the file output node, that’s a limitation currently, there is no type of metadata node socket for passing along that information from one node to another."
Member

Added subscribers: @BoUBoU, @StephenSwaney

Added subscribers: @BoUBoU, @StephenSwaney

Up on this topic, I have the same issues here, and it's all about metadata. #72673

The file output node is pretty important when we are using "classic professionnal" software in compositing (as @machieb said, it's the only simple way to render only one view layer at time ...).

No promess, but we may have someone in our team who would look at it ...

Up on this topic, I have the same issues here, and it's all about metadata. [#72673 ](https://developer.blender.org/T72673) The file output node is pretty important when we are using "classic professionnal" software in compositing (as @machieb said, it's the only simple way to render only one view layer at time ...). No promess, but we may have someone in our team who would look at it ...

Added subscriber: @Pipeliner

Added subscriber: @Pipeliner
Philipp Oeser changed title from Cryptomatte - File Output node is messing up the multilayer exr, so blender cryptomattes are not working in the compositing app Blackmagic Fusion 9. to Cryptomatte - File Output node is messing up the multilayer exr (metadata), so blender cryptomattes cannot be read properly in external compositors 2020-01-16 11:24:09 +01:00
Member
Added subscribers: @Wizard_Semyon, @brecht, @lichtwerk, @Stefan_Werner, @JacquesLucke
Member

Added subscriber: @Sergey

Added subscriber: @Sergey
Member

@Jeroen-Bakker, @Sergey: not sure this should see some love in {#69190}? Seems to be pretty bad for a bigger pipeline?

@Jeroen-Bakker, @Sergey: not sure this should see some love in {#69190}? Seems to be pretty bad for a bigger pipeline?

perhaps each input should silently receive the metadata if present. I'm guessing it's ouput from the cryptomatte output in order for it to work in the compositor (unless the cryptomatte node is accessing it from a known location rather than it's inputs.

perhaps each input should silently receive the metadata if present. I'm guessing it's ouput from the cryptomatte output in order for it to work in the compositor (unless the cryptomatte node is accessing it from a known location rather than it's inputs.

sorry, im not specialist - you find solution this trouble? How can in animation now make cryptomatte export?

sorry, im not specialist - you find solution this trouble? How can in animation now make cryptomatte export?

Added subscriber: @bowserlm

Added subscriber: @bowserlm

Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline.

Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline.

In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote:
Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline.

use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless.

> In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote: > Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline. use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless.

Added subscriber: @c2ba

Added subscriber: @c2ba

you'll need to render it as an animation though, so set the frame range to just one frame.

you'll need to render it as an animation though, so set the frame range to just one frame.

In #64953#866293, @3di wrote:

In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote:
Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline.

use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless.

Sorry, didnt understand how did it. I need to up Cryptomatte, set setting on scene-output. Enough? But in Nuke I dont see any information. Settings in screeshot. Look right? File exr attached too
2020-02-06_00-08-38.png

shot020400.exr

> In #64953#866293, @3di wrote: >> In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote: >> Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline. > > use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless. Sorry, didnt understand how did it. I need to up Cryptomatte, set setting on scene-output. Enough? But in Nuke I dont see any information. Settings in screeshot. Look right? File exr attached too ![2020-02-06_00-08-38.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8323912/2020-02-06_00-08-38.png) ![shot020400.exr](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8323914/shot020400.exr)

I just did a render from the Output section with Cryptomatte activated and I get the same Fusion fail lacking the manifest metadata as the poster above.

Yesterday on a different scene I did successfully get a Cryptomatte pass to work. No idea what is different.

I just did a render from the Output section with Cryptomatte activated and I get the same Fusion fail lacking the manifest metadata as the poster above. Yesterday on a different scene I did successfully get a Cryptomatte pass to work. No idea what is different.

Update the cryptomatte plugin for nuke/fusion I think is the answer:

https://github.com/Psyop/Cryptomatte

Update the cryptomatte plugin for nuke/fusion I think is the answer: https://github.com/Psyop/Cryptomatte

In #64953#866456, @3di wrote:
Update the cryptomatte plugin for nuke/fusion I think is the answer:

https://github.com/Psyop/Cryptomatte

This could solve a part of the problem because indeed the Nuke/fusion could be well improved, but the main issue here is the fact that there are no metadata at all in the openexr files out of file nodes output, and those are very usefull in complexe compositing

In #64953#866293, @3di wrote:

In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote:
Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline.

use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless.

Unfortunatelly, we actually can't use the main blender output with openexr multilayer, because all renderlayers are merged into one and only one file, which means that if you separated characters and background into 2 different layers, if you want to render one layer, you have to render both at the same time, which have a heavy cost, and which can't be done often, in solo project either in production.

Actually the simpliest way to use the main output is to Split All aovs and layers into separate files, but that means easly dozen different image sequences per shot..

> In #64953#866456, @3di wrote: > Update the cryptomatte plugin for nuke/fusion I think is the answer: > > https://github.com/Psyop/Cryptomatte This could solve a part of the problem because indeed the Nuke/fusion could be well improved, but the main issue here is the fact that there are no metadata at all in the openexr files out of file nodes output, and those are very usefull in complexe compositing > In #64953#866293, @3di wrote: >> In #64953#866282, @bowserlm wrote: >> Having the same issue here in a studio pipeline. > > use the output section instead of the file output node, works in external softwares then. File output node is a bit useless. Unfortunatelly, we actually can't use the main blender output with openexr multilayer, because all renderlayers are merged into one and only one file, which means that if you separated characters and background into 2 different layers, if you want to render one layer, you have to render both at the same time, which have a heavy cost, and which can't be done often, in solo project either in production. Actually the simpliest way to use the main output is to Split All aovs and layers into separate files, but that means easly dozen different image sequences per shot..

You could use the 'Use for Rendering' checkbox or 'Render Single Layer' checkbox in the render layer settings to only render an individual layer.

Alternatively (I haven't tried this), buy you could try duplicating the scene as a linked copy, enable one view layer in one scene, and the other in the other scene, then set the compositor up to render both scenes. I'm thinking this might result in 2 exr's because both scenes will have their own output properties.

You could use the 'Use for Rendering' checkbox or 'Render Single Layer' checkbox in the render layer settings to only render an individual layer. Alternatively (I haven't tried this), buy you could try duplicating the scene as a linked copy, enable one view layer in one scene, and the other in the other scene, then set the compositor up to render both scenes. I'm thinking this might result in 2 exr's because both scenes will have their own output properties.

On a scene I'm currently trying to debug the Cryptomatte EXRs aren't working even if the render is coming from the Output pane. The Cryptomatte does work in the Blender compositor, but in Fusion I get the error about the missing manifest.

On a scene I'm currently trying to debug the Cryptomatte EXRs aren't working even if the render is coming from the Output pane. The Cryptomatte does work in the Blender compositor, but in Fusion I get the error about the missing manifest.

In #64953#867167, @bowserlm wrote:
On a scene I'm currently trying to debug the Cryptomatte EXRs aren't working even if the render is coming from the Output pane. The Cryptomatte does work in the Blender compositor, but in Fusion I get the error about the missing manifest.

That's what I was talking about : blender's cryptomatte reader is working only with visual values (which is simple but effective) whereas in Nuke and fusion, the cryptomatte plugin need a manifesto which is writtent in the metadatas of the exr file.

In blender, by using the main output, those metadatas are written in the exr, in the file output, they are not.

> In #64953#867167, @bowserlm wrote: > On a scene I'm currently trying to debug the Cryptomatte EXRs aren't working even if the render is coming from the Output pane. The Cryptomatte does work in the Blender compositor, but in Fusion I get the error about the missing manifest. That's what I was talking about : blender's cryptomatte reader is working only with visual values (which is simple but effective) whereas in Nuke and fusion, the cryptomatte plugin need a manifesto which is writtent in the metadatas of the exr file. In blender, by using the main output, those metadatas are written in the exr, in the file output, they are not.

Right. In my case though, even out of the Main Output it's still missing the manifest.

Right. In my case though, even out of the Main Output it's still missing the manifest.

Updated to the latest version of Cryptomatte 1.2.5 and still no luck over here getting a Cryptomatte out of Blender. Still says it's missing the manifest.

Updated to the latest version of Cryptomatte 1.2.5 and still no luck over here getting a Cryptomatte out of Blender. Still says it's missing the manifest.

Added subscriber: @xprom

Added subscriber: @xprom

blender 2.82a
in certain projects it writes the manifest into the exr and the cryptomatte can be used in external app (nuke in my case). next project it's not working at all.

Output panel directly or via linked scene etc. tried everything..

What is the magic button to make blender write the cryptomatte manifest to the multilayer exr always?

blender 2.82a in certain projects it writes the manifest into the exr and the cryptomatte can be used in external app (nuke in my case). next project it's not working at all. Output panel directly or via linked scene etc. tried everything.. What is the magic button to make blender write the cryptomatte manifest to the multilayer exr always?

guys! I CAN FIND SOLUTION!

  1. default out, coz compositor cant work.
  2. open multiexr
  3. NO compression.
  4. cryptomatte on =)
  5. compression can after render - winrar good work
  6. Enjoy
guys! I CAN FIND SOLUTION! 1. default out, coz compositor cant work. 2. open multiexr 3. NO compression. 4. cryptomatte on =) 5. compression can after render - winrar good work 6. Enjoy

Hello,

cryptomatte is working fine in blender if you use the main blender output (no compositing file output node!)
You have to output to a multilayer exr. Compression should be lossless.
This cryptomattes from blender then work in Photoshop (exrio plugin), Fusion and After Effects.
I don´t have Nuke so I don´t know if it´s working there?

Cheers

Hello, cryptomatte is working fine in blender if you use the main blender output **(no compositing file output node!**) You have to output to a multilayer exr. Compression should be **lossless**. This cryptomattes from blender then work in Photoshop (exrio plugin), Fusion and After Effects. I don´t have Nuke so I don´t know if it´s working there? Cheers

yes, if you will work on my guide https://developer.blender.org/T64953#943172

yes, if you will work on my guide https://developer.blender.org/T64953#943172

Sometimes I can write multilayer exr files out of blender that have a working exr manifest in it. Following Semyon guide and many others.

I know it is only possible to do it with the file output node. It works in certain test scenes and in others it just does not. The metadata for the cryptomatte is not written into the file.

It feels to me very random - even when i build a simple test setup with a few cubes it fails sometimes. What is stopping it from writing it out? I just can not find any difference in my render setups.

When and where does this cryptomatte manifest be generated?

Thanks in advance for any hints:)

Sometimes I can write multilayer exr files out of blender that have a working exr manifest in it. Following Semyon guide and many others. I know it is only possible to do it with the file output node. It works in certain test scenes and in others it just does not. The metadata for the cryptomatte is not written into the file. It feels to me very random - even when i build a simple test setup with a few cubes it fails sometimes. What is stopping it from writing it out? I just can not find any difference in my render setups. When and where does this cryptomatte manifest be generated? Thanks in advance for any hints:)

Added subscriber: @platerytter

Added subscriber: @platerytter

Any updates to this issue ?

Our current workflow is to use the compositor to output all of our passes with our internal naming convention and properly denoised passes. However, like so many av pointed out we're unable to get the metadata into the EXRs while using the compositors file output node.

Without having to setup a new scene SPECIFICALLY to output the metadata is there perhaps a quick fix the devs can look into? Its just a matter of piping the data through the same EXR saver back-end right ?

Any updates to this issue ? Our current workflow is to use the compositor to output all of our passes with our internal naming convention and properly denoised passes. However, like so many av pointed out we're unable to get the metadata into the EXRs while using the compositors file output node. Without having to setup a new scene SPECIFICALLY to output the metadata is there perhaps a quick fix the devs can look into? Its just a matter of piping the data through the same EXR saver back-end right ?

Added subscriber: @vfxninjaeditor

Added subscriber: @vfxninjaeditor

I too am wondering on updates to this issue. Without a fix it makes it impossible to setup custom file output nodes for external compositors like After Effects. The only real workaround is duplicating the scene and setting it up to only output cryptomatte layers.

I too am wondering on updates to this issue. Without a fix it makes it impossible to setup custom file output nodes for external compositors like After Effects. The only real workaround is duplicating the scene and setting it up to only output cryptomatte layers.

Added subscriber: @Carlosan

Added subscriber: @Carlosan

Same problem on our side.

Same problem on our side.
Member

Added subscriber: @EAW

Added subscriber: @EAW
Member

Just noticed that this doesn't have a module tag.

Just noticed that this doesn't have a module tag.
Member

Cryptomatte is currently being added in EEVEE, but the other older tasks I have found are tag under the Render & Cycles module. This is a compositing issue though which falls under VFX & Video. Tagging them all to notify the module members, who can decide where it should go.

Cryptomatte is currently being added in EEVEE, but the other older tasks I have found are tag under the Render & Cycles module. This is a compositing issue though which falls under VFX & Video. Tagging them all to notify the module members, who can decide where it should go.

Added subscriber: @pietro

Added subscriber: @pietro
Jeroen Bakker self-assigned this 2021-01-06 07:49:29 +01:00

This issue was referenced by 957e292c58

This issue was referenced by 957e292c5864cba3cf62c7c59dc644422660034f
Member

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Soorry, didnt understand - now export cryptomatte isnt work for cycles?

Soorry, didnt understand - now export cryptomatte isnt work for cycles?

Added subscriber: @Hongyu

Added subscriber: @Hongyu

is this available right now?

is this available right now?

{F9602927}y7mrhl2RQN.mp4
could not make it work in fusion
any fusion user here that made it work?
(blender 2.92 beta latest)
i exported object material and asset in a multilayer, then import in loader node then plug to crypto matte node(version 1.2.8)
it will only read object layer, if i try to touch the layer slider the entire cryptomatte node crash, not even the object layer will show again

but it will work if I only use one crypto matte layer like only "object" or "material" but if I use multiple, then it doesn't work.

{[F9602927](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9602927/blender_OjHxG0p102.png)}[y7mrhl2RQN.mp4](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9602645/y7mrhl2RQN.mp4) could not make it work in fusion any fusion user here that made it work? (blender 2.92 beta latest) i exported object material and asset in a multilayer, then import in loader node then plug to crypto matte node(version 1.2.8) it will only read object layer, if i try to touch the layer slider the entire cryptomatte node crash, not even the object layer will show again but it will work if I only use one crypto matte layer like only "object" or "material" but if I use multiple, then it doesn't work.

Added subscriber: @GaryRitchie

Added subscriber: @GaryRitchie

Added subscriber: @JamesBarrie

Added subscriber: @JamesBarrie
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
25 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#64953
No description provided.