Allow tasks to be read-only by public #69421

Closed
opened 2019-09-02 19:38:50 +02:00 by Dalai Felinto · 5 comments

We are trying to find ways to keep the discussion focused in some tasks before opening them up for the public contribution.

For that it would be nice if we could restrict the access to reply in some tasks to a subgroup of phabricator users.

Example of tasks we would like to try this system:

  • #69403 (Projects for Pablo Dobarro)
  • #69399 (Projects for Germano Cavalcante)

This could be used for design tasks as well, where we first have it writable by the module members, and later we open for the public. For example, #69132 got overwhelmed too early by noisy and unfriendly comments.

Since this is a sensitive matter (on our quest to be as open as possible), we would like to restrict this for the mentorship tasks at first, before considering it broad usage.

We are trying to find ways to keep the discussion focused in some tasks before opening them up for the public contribution. For that it would be nice if we could restrict the access to reply in some tasks to a subgroup of phabricator users. Example of tasks we would like to try this system: * #69403 (Projects for Pablo Dobarro) * #69399 (Projects for Germano Cavalcante) This could be used for design tasks as well, where we first have it writable by the module members, and later we open for the public. For example, #69132 got overwhelmed too early by noisy and unfriendly comments. Since this is a sensitive matter (on our quest to be as open as possible), we would like to restrict this for the mentorship tasks at first, before considering it broad usage.
Author
Owner

Added subscribers: @dfelinto, @jesterking, @ideasman42

Added subscribers: @dfelinto, @jesterking, @ideasman42

Added subscriber: @nokipaike

Added subscriber: @nokipaike

Maybe this suggestion I'm about to make, someone won't like it, but it doesn't matter,
I have something to say that I think is important.

Don't lock yourself up to be more comfortable, don't be afraid of noise.

People rarely intervene, and when they do it is because they have to suggest something they know well.

This of the Transform object origins design task was something that many users knew well from other environments in which they used it, and some suggestions were initially asked.

Not frightening "of noise", maybe it seems that it makes you lose some time at first, but from brainstorming you always come up with useful tricks and corrections that you miss. People have great respect for you Devs, don't forget it.

Look at the examples of the now fantastic GSoCs Outliner and Custom bevel profiles. they have become masterpieces also thanks to all the suggestions that users have given to devs.

While people rarely intervene in things they don't know, even if they are fascinating ... such as the VR support via openXR.

If you don't want noise here on the development platform, at least create a system that opens a discussion on devtalk automatically and diverts the suggestions of ordinary people there.

Greetings Masters.

Maybe this suggestion I'm about to make, someone won't like it, but it doesn't matter, I have something to say that I think is important. Don't lock yourself up to be more comfortable, don't be afraid of noise. People rarely intervene, and when they do it is because they have to suggest something they know well. This of the **Transform object origins design task** was something that many users knew well from other environments in which they used it, and some suggestions were initially asked. Not frightening "of noise", maybe it seems that it makes you lose some time at first, but from brainstorming you always come up with useful tricks and corrections that you miss. People have great respect for you Devs, don't forget it. Look at the examples of the now fantastic GSoCs Outliner and Custom bevel profiles. they have become masterpieces also thanks to all the suggestions that users have given to devs. While people rarely intervene in things they don't know, even if they are fascinating ... such as the VR support via openXR. If you don't want noise here on the development platform, at least create a system that opens a discussion on devtalk automatically and diverts the suggestions of ordinary people there. Greetings Masters.
Author
Owner

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Archived'
Dalai Felinto self-assigned this 2020-11-11 12:56:04 +01:00
Author
Owner

I will archive this. The need for this faded a bit recently, and we can already do something like this using custom policies.

I will archive this. The need for this faded a bit recently, and we can already do something like this using custom policies.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#69421
No description provided.