Mantaflow smoke simulation render looks different in 2.82 and 2.83 #78290

Closed
opened 2020-06-26 05:45:06 +02:00 by jagsir Khokhar · 16 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19041-SP0 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce 940MX/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 446.14

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.83.1, branch: master, commit date: 2020-06-25 09:47, hash: 8289fc688b

Short description of error
Mantaflow smoke simulation looks different in 2.82 and 2.83

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
In Blender 2.82 and 2.83 bake following file, render and compare results.
blende2.82a.blend

**System Information** Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19041-SP0 64 Bits Graphics card: GeForce 940MX/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 446.14 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.83.1, branch: master, commit date: 2020-06-25 09:47, hash: `8289fc688b` **Short description of error** Mantaflow smoke simulation looks different in 2.82 and 2.83 **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** In Blender 2.82 and 2.83 bake following file, render and compare results. [blende2.82a.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8644910/blende2.82a.blend)
Author

Added subscriber: @kkjagsir

Added subscriber: @kkjagsir

Added subscriber: @iss

Added subscriber: @iss

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'

did you rebake this file in version 2.83? It is possible that there have been changes in how cache works and simulation needs to be re-baked

did you rebake this file in version 2.83? It is possible that there have been changes in how cache works and simulation needs to be re-baked
Author

yes i re bake in blender 2.83 and blender 2.82a

yes i re bake in blender 2.83 and blender 2.82a

I can not confirm that baking noise as specified will remove density as can be seen in following image.
Untitled.png

Do you want to claim, that there are differences between baking simulation in 2.82 and 2.83?

I can not confirm that baking noise as specified will remove density as can be seen in following image. ![Untitled.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8655760/Untitled.png) Do you want to claim, that there are differences between baking simulation in 2.82 and 2.83?
Author

here i re baking in blender mantaflow simulation
after noise bake in blender 2.83.1

it remove density from simulation also viewport and render but in viewport display color mapping its showing density

but in blender 2.82a its working will

blend.mp4

blender.rar

here i re baking in blender mantaflow simulation after noise bake in blender 2.83.1 it remove density from simulation also viewport and render but in viewport display color mapping its showing density but in blender 2.82a its working will [blend.mp4](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8660077/blend.mp4) [blender.rar](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F8660079/blender.rar)
Richard Antalik changed title from mantaflow noise upres remove density to Mantaflow smoke simulation render looks different in 2.82 and 2.83 2020-07-03 01:09:44 +02:00

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Confirmed'

@kkjagsir Look of simulation in viewport in 2.83 has been changed - https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.83/Physics
There is no mention about change in render, so I will confirm on basis of that. This may not be bug as well though

@kkjagsir Look of simulation in viewport in 2.83 has been changed - https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/2.83/Physics There is no mention about change in render, so I will confirm on basis of that. This may not be bug as well though
Member

Added subscriber: @JacquesLucke

Added subscriber: @JacquesLucke
Member

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Needs User Info'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Needs User Info'
Member

Can you provide a side by side comparison of the old and new behaviors? Please also show how it looks like in Blender 2.90.
A 6 minute long video is too long to be useful here.

Can you provide a side by side comparison of the old and new behaviors? Please also show how it looks like in Blender 2.90. A 6 minute long video is too long to be useful here.
Author

no now i can't do this , delete this post, i will never report anything ,thanks

no now i can't do this , delete this post, i will never report anything ,thanks

Added subscriber: @sebbas

Added subscriber: @sebbas

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Resolved'
Sebastián Barschkis self-assigned this 2020-07-20 12:32:05 +02:00

This looks like the same issue from #79029. I wrote a few tips over there which people from this thread might find interesting too.

Will close since it seems that @kkjagsir "will never report anything".

This looks like the same issue from #79029. I wrote a few tips over there which people from this thread might find interesting too. Will close since it seems that @kkjagsir "will never report anything".
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#78290
No description provided.