Create Workspace for Geometry Nodes #86499

Closed
opened 2021-03-11 15:05:33 +01:00 by Dalai Felinto · 34 comments

The workspace needs to include the spreadsheet editor, and the node tree editor.

The workspace needs to include the spreadsheet editor, and the node tree editor.
Author
Owner

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Author
Owner

Added subscriber: @dfelinto

Added subscriber: @dfelinto
Member

Added subscriber: @HooglyBoogly

Added subscriber: @HooglyBoogly
Member

This is the workspace I use: I often wish we had a separate set of 21:9 workspaces...
image.png

Here it is at 16:9:
image.png

How about this one? Maybe the spreadsheet is slightly too big?

This is the workspace I use: I often wish we had a separate set of 21:9 workspaces... ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914767/image.png) Here it is at 16:9: ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914770/image.png) How about this one? Maybe the spreadsheet is slightly too big?

Added subscriber: @MiroHorvath

Added subscriber: @MiroHorvath

Actually Outliner and Properties are slightly too big to my taste. Spreadsheet can be wider.

Actually Outliner and Properties are slightly too big to my taste. Spreadsheet can be wider.
Member

Yeah, same here actually.
Something like this maybe. (Spreadsheet slightly wider maybe)
image.png

Yeah, same here actually. Something like this maybe. (Spreadsheet slightly wider maybe) ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914835/image.png)

Added subscriber: @deadpin

Added subscriber: @deadpin

With what little geometry nodes stuff I've done so far, I end up in 1 of the 2 configurations below.

The gist is that you need a lot more horizontal space for the spreadsheet compared to vertical. I can tell how my attributes are behaving with only a small handful of rows, so seeing 60+ rows isn't typically necessary. Also, due to the horizontal graphs today, I tend to use as wide as possible graph spaces (or I switch to vertical if the nodes are too tall and/or there's too many attributes to fit in spreadsheet)

layout-1.png

layout-2.png

With what little geometry nodes stuff I've done so far, I end up in 1 of the 2 configurations below. The gist is that you need a lot more horizontal space for the spreadsheet compared to vertical. I can tell how my attributes are behaving with only a small handful of rows, so seeing 60+ rows isn't typically necessary. Also, due to the horizontal graphs today, I tend to use as wide as possible graph spaces (or I switch to vertical if the nodes are too tall and/or there's too many attributes to fit in spreadsheet) ![layout-1.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914870/layout-1.png) ![layout-2.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914872/layout-2.png)
Contributor

Added subscriber: @KenzieMac130

Added subscriber: @KenzieMac130
Contributor

In #86499#1138695, @deadpin wrote:
With what little geometry nodes stuff I've done so far, I end up in 1 of the 2 configurations below.

The gist is that you need a lot more horizontal space for the spreadsheet compared to vertical. I can tell how my attributes are behaving with only a small handful of rows, so seeing 60+ rows isn't typically necessary. Also, due to the horizontal graphs today, I tend to use as wide as possible graph spaces (or I switch to vertical if the nodes are too tall and/or there's too many attributes to fit in spreadsheet)

layout-1.png

[...]

I am a big fan of the first layout!!!

Feels like there is a lot of room to get stuff done while putting emphasis on the node editor. The viewport is close to the outliner and properties which makes working with the scene more pleasant. The spreadsheet is just the right size to get the just of what is happening with the geometry while staying out of the way of screen real-estate that can be used for the graph. The smaller viewport on the right is also consistent with the motion tracking workspace. It scales reasonably well to small window sizes while being readable and really feels good on my UHD. One change I would propose is keeping the timeline as this is useful for vfx and sims.

image.png
image.png

> In #86499#1138695, @deadpin wrote: > With what little geometry nodes stuff I've done so far, I end up in 1 of the 2 configurations below. > > The gist is that you need a lot more horizontal space for the spreadsheet compared to vertical. I can tell how my attributes are behaving with only a small handful of rows, so seeing 60+ rows isn't typically necessary. Also, due to the horizontal graphs today, I tend to use as wide as possible graph spaces (or I switch to vertical if the nodes are too tall and/or there's too many attributes to fit in spreadsheet) > > ![layout-1.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9914870/layout-1.png) > > [...] I am a big fan of the first layout!!! Feels like there is a lot of room to get stuff done while putting emphasis on the node editor. The viewport is close to the outliner and properties which makes working with the scene more pleasant. The spreadsheet is just the right size to get the just of what is happening with the geometry while staying out of the way of screen real-estate that can be used for the graph. The smaller viewport on the right is also consistent with the motion tracking workspace. It scales reasonably well to small window sizes while being readable and really feels good on my UHD. One change I would propose is keeping the timeline as this is useful for vfx and sims. ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915409/image.png) ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915412/image.png)
Author
Owner

Added subscriber: @SimonThommes

Added subscriber: @SimonThommes
Author
Owner

@HooglyBoogly, comments in your original screenshots:

  • Better to focus in the 16:9 indeed.
  • Spreadsheet needs more horizontal than vertical space.
  • Properties + outliner were too wide.

@SimonThommes would you use the node editor on top or below the other editors? How do you usually work?

@HooglyBoogly, comments in your original screenshots: * Better to focus in the 16:9 indeed. * Spreadsheet needs more horizontal than vertical space. * Properties + outliner were too wide. @SimonThommes would you use the node editor on top or below the other editors? How do you usually work?
Member

I was thinking of this for the workspace:
image.png

  • Proportions are mainly based on the Modeling one
  • I agree that vertical space in the spreadsheet is not as important (50:50 vertical split between node editor and spreadsheet + viewport)
  • Viewport should be top and center imo
  • Viewport is more important than spreadsheet (3:5 horizontal space ratio)

A bunch of things should probably be adjusted once we have things like attribute overlays, geometry node viewer

I was thinking of this for the workspace: ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915605/image.png) - Proportions are mainly based on the `Modeling` one - I agree that vertical space in the spreadsheet is not as important (50:50 vertical split between node editor and spreadsheet + viewport) - Viewport should be top and center imo - Viewport is more important than spreadsheet (3:5 horizontal space ratio) A bunch of things should probably be adjusted once we have things like attribute overlays, geometry node viewer
Member

Actually... maybe the outliner should be more prominent, as we support linking collections/objects.
So maybe the same proportions as Layout would be good here:
image.png

Actually... maybe the outliner should be more prominent, as we support linking collections/objects. So maybe the same proportions as `Layout` would be good here: ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915611/image.png)
Contributor

In #86499#1138993, @SimonThommes wrote:
Actually... maybe the outliner should be more prominent, as we support linking collections/objects.
So maybe the same proportions as Layout would be good here:
image.png

Should the workspace be named something different then "Geometry Nodes"? Maybe "Procedural Modeling" or something similar? It seems the other categories describe the workflow rather than the system or a the name of a single editor.

> In #86499#1138993, @SimonThommes wrote: > Actually... maybe the outliner should be more prominent, as we support linking collections/objects. > So maybe the same proportions as `Layout` would be good here: > ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915611/image.png) Should the workspace be named something different then "Geometry Nodes"? Maybe "Procedural Modeling" or something similar? It seems the other categories describe the workflow rather than the system or a the name of a single editor.
Member

In #86499#1139018, @KenzieMac130 wrote:

Should the workspace be named something different then "Geometry Nodes"? Maybe "Procedural Modeling" or something similar? It seems the other categories describe the workflow rather than the system or a the name of a single editor.

I'm not sure about the name, but I agree that it should probably not be Geometry Nodes.

> In #86499#1139018, @KenzieMac130 wrote: > > Should the workspace be named something different then "Geometry Nodes"? Maybe "Procedural Modeling" or something similar? It seems the other categories describe the workflow rather than the system or a the name of a single editor. I'm not sure about the name, but I agree that it should probably not be `Geometry Nodes`.

Added subscriber: @Erindale

Added subscriber: @Erindale

I've gone down a similar path for my workspace but I additionally have a Shader Editor on the bottom right that I can pull over if I want to do quick material tweaks without having to load another workspace
image.png

With the Attribute Processor in the future, if we move away from linear graphs then it might not work so well. The Shader workspace is a good example of this issue.

I've gone down a similar path for my workspace but I additionally have a Shader Editor on the bottom right that I can pull over if I want to do quick material tweaks without having to load another workspace ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915966/image.png) With the Attribute Processor in the future, if we move away from linear graphs then it might not work so well. The Shader workspace is a good example of this issue.
Member

Added subscriber: @FabianSchempp

Added subscriber: @FabianSchempp
Member

In #86499#1138993, @SimonThommes wrote:
image.png

I think when we get the data set sidebar for the spreadsheet we may need some additional horizontal space.
So maybe we use a 50/50 split between Spreadsheet and 3DView?

> In #86499#1138993, @SimonThommes wrote: > ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9915611/image.png) I think when we get the data set sidebar for the spreadsheet we may need some additional horizontal space. So maybe we use a 50/50 split between Spreadsheet and 3DView?
Member

In #86499#1141246, @FabianSchempp wrote:

I think when we get the data set sidebar for the spreadsheet we may need some additional horizontal space.
So maybe we use a 50/50 split between Spreadsheet and 3DView?

That's a good point. I think we might have to readjust the workspace a couple of times for new UI elements but this one we might as well do now, even though it won't be in 2.93 afaik.

> In #86499#1141246, @FabianSchempp wrote: > > I think when we get the data set sidebar for the spreadsheet we may need some additional horizontal space. > So maybe we use a 50/50 split between Spreadsheet and 3DView? That's a good point. I think we might have to readjust the workspace a couple of times for new UI elements but this one we might as well do now, even though it won't be in 2.93 afaik.

Added subscriber: @randum

Added subscriber: @randum

This is what I found more or less convenient
2021-04-13_08-20-13.png

This is what I found more or less convenient ![2021-04-13_08-20-13.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9931361/2021-04-13_08-20-13.png)

Added subscriber: @LloydAlmeida

Added subscriber: @LloydAlmeida

3D View and Attribute Editor share a Horizontal block. ( Can give focus to the relevant Editor on the fly )
3D View Menus Collapsed ( Less visual noise when the User needs more focus on the Attribute Editor) and Vertex Shading On by Default. overlays and Navigation hidden.

Outliner and Properties Editor share a Vertical block ( Can give focus to the relevant Editor on the fly )

Timeline to scrub/play for Animation.
GeoNodesLayout.png

3D View and Attribute Editor share a Horizontal block. ( Can give focus to the relevant Editor on the fly ) 3D View Menus Collapsed ( Less visual noise when the User needs more focus on the Attribute Editor) and Vertex Shading On by Default. overlays and Navigation hidden. Outliner and Properties Editor share a Vertical block ( Can give focus to the relevant Editor on the fly ) Timeline to scrub/play for Animation. ![GeoNodesLayout.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9931669/GeoNodesLayout.png)

This issue was referenced by ac90c8a774

This issue was referenced by ac90c8a7743f6d01ae2c013207ce9cd90cc87b66
Hans Goudey self-assigned this 2021-04-14 20:56:41 +02:00
Member

{F9933700 size=full}

{[F9933700](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9933700/image.png) size=full}

Added subscriber: @ephraimpauli

Added subscriber: @ephraimpauli

My suggestion:
Geometry Nodes Wokspace.png

My suggestion: ![Geometry Nodes Wokspace.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9933711/Geometry_Nodes_Wokspace.png)
Contributor

Added subscriber: @Eary

Added subscriber: @Eary
Contributor

For some reason I need to click the File ->Defaults -> Load Factory Settings to see the new workspace, but when I look into the preference settings, I cannot seem to find the relevant setting. I have not saved any custum startup scene, I am just using the official default cube scene. I don't want to completely lose my previous settings just for a new workspace, but I still want the workspace to be up there by default. Can someone tell me why this is happening and how to fix it?

For some reason I need to click the File ->Defaults -> Load Factory Settings to see the new workspace, but when I look into the preference settings, I cannot seem to find the relevant setting. I have not saved any custum startup scene, I am just using the official default cube scene. I don't want to completely lose my previous settings just for a new workspace, but I still want the workspace to be up there by default. Can someone tell me why this is happening and how to fix it?
Author
Owner

@Eary see the commit message on http:developer.blender.org/rBac90c8a7743f6d01ae2c013207ce9cd90cc87b66:"Note that while existing startup files won't have this workspace added, it will be in the list of options when clicking on the "add workspace" button."//

@Eary see the commit message on http:*developer.blender.org/rBac90c8a7743f6d01ae2c013207ce9cd90cc87b66:*"Note that while existing startup files won't have this workspace added, it will be in the list of options when clicking on the "add workspace" button."//
Author
Owner

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
13 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#86499
No description provided.