Edges of concave geometry get clipped #88830

Open
opened 2021-06-04 14:33:52 +02:00 by Konstantins Visnevskis · 7 comments

System Information
Operating system: Linux-5.8.0-53-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.31 64 Bits
Graphics card: GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 390.143

Blender Version
Broken: version: 2.93.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-06-02 11:21, hash: 84da05a8b8

Short description of error
It seems recent that viewport mesh drawing was visually greatly improved, however some time ago I started noticing problems.
Namely - edge wire overlay getting clipped on concave polygons, making viewport facing vertices unselectable and the topology unreadable (x-ray doesn't help surface shape readability either).
I might be doing something very obvious wrong, of course :)

screen.jpg

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error

  • Open,
  • Some edges/vertices don't show up properly or at all.

mesh.blend

**System Information** Operating system: Linux-5.8.0-53-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.31 64 Bits Graphics card: GeForce GTX 560/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 390.143 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 2.93.0, branch: master, commit date: 2021-06-02 11:21, hash: `84da05a8b8` **Short description of error** It seems recent that viewport mesh drawing was visually greatly improved, however some time ago I started noticing problems. Namely - edge wire overlay getting clipped on concave polygons, making viewport facing vertices unselectable and the topology unreadable (x-ray doesn't help surface shape readability either). I might be doing something very obvious wrong, of course :) ![screen.jpg](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F10157846/screen.jpg) **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** - Open, - Some edges/vertices don't show up properly or at all. [mesh.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F10157848/mesh.blend)

Added subscriber: @KonstantinsVisnevskis

Added subscriber: @KonstantinsVisnevskis
Konstantins Visnevskis changed title from Wdges of concave geometry get clipped to Edges of concave geometry get clipped 2021-06-04 14:35:03 +02:00
Member

Added subscribers: @fclem, @lichtwerk

Added subscribers: @fclem, @lichtwerk
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'
Member

Ortho view is kind of sensitive to a small range of View Clip Start > View Clip End.
This is not a problem in Perspective.

A Clip End of 200m gets rid of all this.

however some time ago I started noticing problems.

For me, this has been like this since 2.80, does this behave differently in 2.80 for you?

Anyways, why the range has to be so large in Ortho? Not sure to be honest, maybe @fclem can share his wisdom.

`Ortho` view is kind of sensitive to a small range of `View Clip Start` > `View Clip End`. This is not a problem in Perspective. A Clip End of 200m gets rid of all this. > however some time ago I started noticing problems. For me, this has been like this since 2.80, does this behave differently in 2.80 for you? Anyways, why the range has to be so large in Ortho? Not sure to be honest, maybe @fclem can share his wisdom.

For me, this has been like this since 2.80, does this behave differently in 2.80 for you?

Yes, it behaves the same, it's just that:

This is not a problem in Perspective.

this is why it seemed like happening semi "randomly" and probably wasn't noticed too often before.

A Clip End of 200m gets rid of all this.

Thanks! That did the trick. I always assumed narrowing clipping range reduces z-granularity, but apparently that's also what's used to offset wire Z clipping. For me it's 500m to draw it nicely in this case, which I wouldn't ever be thinking to enter for a 1m object modelling. In fact I've tried varying clipping, but not to such extent.

> For me, this has been like this since 2.80, does this behave differently in 2.80 for you? Yes, it behaves the same, it's just that: > This is not a problem in Perspective. this is why it seemed like happening semi "randomly" and probably wasn't noticed too often before. > A Clip End of 200m gets rid of all this. Thanks! That did the trick. I always assumed narrowing clipping range reduces z-granularity, but apparently that's also what's used to offset wire Z clipping. For me it's 500m to draw it nicely in this case, which I wouldn't ever be thinking to enter for a 1m object modelling. In fact I've tried varying clipping, but not to such extent.
Member

In #88830#1170984, @KonstantinsVisnevskis wrote:
Thanks! That did the trick. I always assumed narrowing clipping range reduces z-granularity, but apparently that's also what's used to offset wire Z clipping. For me it's 500m to draw it nicely in this case, which I wouldn't ever be thinking to enter for a 1m object modelling. In fact I've tried varying clipping, but not to such extent.

This is why I also summon @fclem here, I usually would also expect a tight range to be the better choice.

> In #88830#1170984, @KonstantinsVisnevskis wrote: > Thanks! That did the trick. I always assumed narrowing clipping range reduces z-granularity, but apparently that's also what's used to offset wire Z clipping. For me it's 500m to draw it nicely in this case, which I wouldn't ever be thinking to enter for a 1m object modelling. In fact I've tried varying clipping, but not to such extent. This is why I also summon @fclem here, I usually would also expect a tight range to be the better choice.

Relevant to the topic of Wireframe display quality on concave edges:
at oblique angles the concave edges are barely visible in perspective too, requiring Viewport rotation to see the topology or select with confidence. It's unlikely someone consciously notices this often but it does impact efficiency via additional actions.
geo.blend

I understand that it probably is not a trivial problem, but perhaps, if some day anything is to be done about this, a simpler solution could be an adjustable edge thickness, as also, googling on the topic, I've seen complaints on lack of thickness adjustment on it's own.

Relevant to the topic of Wireframe display quality on concave edges: at oblique angles the concave edges are barely visible in perspective too, requiring Viewport rotation to see the topology or select with confidence. It's unlikely someone consciously notices this often but it does impact efficiency via additional actions. [geo.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F10164370/geo.blend) I understand that it probably is not a trivial problem, but perhaps, if some day anything is to be done about this, a simpler solution could be an adjustable edge thickness, as also, googling on the topic, I've seen complaints on lack of thickness adjustment on it's own.
Philipp Oeser removed the
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
label 2023-02-09 15:13:37 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#88830
No description provided.