VSE Strip Thumbnails #89143

Closed
opened 2021-06-14 15:49:49 +02:00 by Aditya Y Jeppu · 16 comments
Member

Design task for the GSoC 2021 : VSE Strip Thumbnails

Main Goals:

  • Strip Thumbnail drawing function
  • Creating a separate job for the thumbnail creation
  • Changing the way thumbnails are stored for better performance

Thumbnails are loaded for each view change or when there are no images stored in cache to draw from. Job runs in background each time and performs only cache storage of images obtained from source. Works for both image sequences and movie strips. GIF shows movie strips, but the same results are seen for image sequences.
The sub-tasks were useful to see progress, but all the components work together, therefore a single task is final result.

The current revision looks like this :
{F10538055 size=full}

Design task for the GSoC 2021 : VSE Strip Thumbnails **Main Goals:** - [x] Strip Thumbnail drawing function - [x] Creating a separate job for the thumbnail creation - [x] Changing the way thumbnails are stored for better performance Thumbnails are loaded for each view change or when there are no images stored in cache to draw from. Job runs in background each time and performs only cache storage of images obtained from source. Works for both image sequences and movie strips. GIF shows movie strips, but the same results are seen for image sequences. The sub-tasks were useful to see progress, but all the components work together, therefore a single task is final result. The current revision looks like this : {[F10538055](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F10538055/final_thumbnails_commited.gif) size=full}
Aditya Y Jeppu self-assigned this 2021-06-14 15:49:49 +02:00
Author
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @quantimoney

Added subscriber: @quantimoney

Added subscriber: @Bearcat

Added subscriber: @Bearcat

Added subscriber: @ugosantana

Added subscriber: @ugosantana

This is such a great feature!

I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners.

It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips.

Anyway, great work!

**This is such a great feature!** I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners. It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips. Anyway, great work!

Added subscriber: @iss

Added subscriber: @iss

In #89143#1185767, @ugosantana wrote:
This is such a great feature!

I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners.

It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips.

Anyway, great work!

It's not a bad point actaully. Perhaps it could be solved by drawing thumbnails with small offset (width of handle perhaps).

Rounded corners are quite outside of scope of this GSOC project.

> In #89143#1185767, @ugosantana wrote: > **This is such a great feature!** > > I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners. > > It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips. > > Anyway, great work! It's not a bad point actaully. Perhaps it could be solved by drawing thumbnails with small offset (width of handle perhaps). Rounded corners are quite outside of scope of this GSOC project.
Author
Member

Added subscribers: @tintwotin, @Harley

Added subscribers: @tintwotin, @Harley
Author
Member

In #89143#1185775, @iss wrote:

In #89143#1185767, @ugosantana wrote:
This is such a great feature!

I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners.

It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips.

Anyway, great work!

It's not a bad point actaully. Perhaps it could be solved by drawing thumbnails with small offset (width of handle perhaps).

Rounded corners are quite outside of scope of this GSOC project.

In case of rounded corners, I think @tintwotin and @Harley had tried to implement that but it didn't work out. @iss the initial implementation started the thumbnail from the handle edge, but I changed it to be more consistent with the colour strips and also this poll (devtalk poll) .

> In #89143#1185775, @iss wrote: >> In #89143#1185767, @ugosantana wrote: >> **This is such a great feature!** >> >> I know this is not the place and time... but I have a little suggestion: the strips should have small rounded corners. >> >> It make it easer to identify strip size, when we have several continuous strips together. The existence of small rectangular preview images, although great for feedback, may make it difficult to differentiate strips. >> >> Anyway, great work! > > It's not a bad point actaully. Perhaps it could be solved by drawing thumbnails with small offset (width of handle perhaps). > > Rounded corners are quite outside of scope of this GSOC project. In case of rounded corners, I think @tintwotin and @Harley had tried to implement that but it didn't work out. @iss the initial implementation started the thumbnail from the handle edge, but I changed it to be more consistent with the colour strips and also this poll [(devtalk poll) ](https://devtalk.blender.org/t/gsoc-2021-video-sequence-editor-strip-previews-and-modification-indicators-feedback/19096/14?u=quantimoney).

I understand that round corners are not part of this. I thought that strip limits could be better presented. What you've done is already great.

I did a mockup over the gif you posted, with more noticeable handles and the rounded ones, just to see the difference.

OPTIONS.gif

Even the way it is now, it is already great.

I understand that round corners are not part of this. I thought that strip limits could be better presented. What you've done is already great. I did a mockup over the gif you posted, with more noticeable handles and the rounded ones, just to see the difference. ![OPTIONS.gif](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F10209583/OPTIONS.gif) Even the way it is now, it is already great.
Author
Member

Yes if you see my proposal I had showcased it like that initially - (image in proposal). It is understandable in this use case as the video that the strip represents is dark and it is very hard to differentiate. So its a valid point. Once selected it becomes very apparent where one strip ends and another strip starts. So two ways - one to change the outline of the strip when not selected, as the thumbnails below the handle have a good look, and the other is to have the handle offset added. I would have to look into the first method, only to choose which colour suits the look. There might be some consistency considerations too. If it isn't possible then method 2 only remains as of now. But thank you for the feedback.

Yes if you see my proposal I had showcased it like that initially - [(image in proposal)](https://wiki.blender.org/w/images/b/be/Image%28a%29_VSE_strip_thumb.png). It is understandable in this use case as the video that the strip represents is dark and it is very hard to differentiate. So its a valid point. Once selected it becomes very apparent where one strip ends and another strip starts. So two ways - one to change the outline of the strip when not selected, as the thumbnails below the handle have a good look, and the other is to have the handle offset added. I would have to look into the first method, only to choose which colour suits the look. There might be some consistency considerations too. If it isn't possible then method 2 only remains as of now. But thank you for the feedback.

This comment was removed by @tintwotin

*This comment was removed by @tintwotin*

Added subscriber: @GeorgiaPacific

Added subscriber: @GeorgiaPacific

Added subscriber: @costa

Added subscriber: @costa

This issue was referenced by 997b5fe45d

This issue was referenced by 997b5fe45dab8bd0e2976c8b673e56266134fc80
Author
Member

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
8 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#89143
No description provided.