Alembic export not respecting the renderable flag. #89594

Closed
opened 2021-07-02 09:41:22 +02:00 by Beorn Leonard · 25 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows 10
Graphics card: nvidia Quadro K4000

Blender Version
Broken: 2.93.1

When exporting an alembic file, when the option to only export renderable objects is checked, the objects flagged as "disable in renders" in the outliner are still exported.
Effectively, the checkbox doesn't seem to do anything, or at least doesn't behave as expected.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
In the default scene, duplicate the cube, move it to the side and flag it "disable in renders" in the outliner.
Export an alembic file.
Delete all objects and import the alembic file you just exported.
Both cubes will be there in the alembic file, and both will be set as renderable.

This is important to fix for example in scenes which use low res geometry for animators to work with, but high res geo for the render.
We need to be able to only export the renderable geo reliably.

**System Information** Operating system: Windows 10 Graphics card: nvidia Quadro K4000 **Blender Version** Broken: 2.93.1 When exporting an alembic file, when the option to only export renderable objects is checked, the objects flagged as "disable in renders" in the outliner are still exported. Effectively, the checkbox doesn't seem to do anything, or at least doesn't behave as expected. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** In the default scene, duplicate the cube, move it to the side and flag it "disable in renders" in the outliner. Export an alembic file. Delete all objects and import the alembic file you just exported. Both cubes will be there in the alembic file, and both will be set as renderable. This is important to fix for example in scenes which use low res geometry for animators to work with, but high res geo for the render. We need to be able to only export the renderable geo reliably.
Author

Added subscriber: @BeornLeonard

Added subscriber: @BeornLeonard
Member

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk

Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Philipp Oeser self-assigned this 2021-07-02 10:39:59 +02:00
Member

Confirmed, will check

Confirmed, will check
Member

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123

Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
Member

Looks like the option to only export renderable objects was broken for a long time.
If checked, it seemed to be working (objects marked non-renderable in the Outliner were pruned from the export), however unchecking that option did not include them in the export

a95f863596 made it so if "renderable_only" is set, it will still export (is now more dependent on the Visible Objects option

Looks like the option to only export renderable objects was broken for a long time. If checked, it seemed to be working (objects marked non-renderable in the Outliner were pruned from the export), however unchecking that option did not include them in the export a95f863596 made it so if "renderable_only" is set, it will still export (is now more dependent on the `Visible Objects` option

Added subscriber: @dr.sybren

Added subscriber: @dr.sybren

@BeornLeonard when exporting to Alembic, objects are evaluated in "render" mode anyway, so "Visible Only" already actually means "Visible When Rendering". Would that solve your problem?

@BeornLeonard when exporting to Alembic, objects are evaluated in "render" mode anyway, so "Visible Only" already actually means "Visible When Rendering". Would that solve your problem?
Member

Renderable Objects only and Visible Objects only are really the same thing, no?
If we find something that makes Visible Objects not sufficient in some usecase, and define how things should work, we can make the option work that way, otherwise removing it seems actually like the way to go I think.

`Renderable Objects` only and `Visible Objects` only are really the same thing, no? If we find something that makes `Visible Objects` not sufficient in some usecase, and define how things should work, we can make the option work that way, otherwise removing it seems actually like the way to go I think.
Member

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Needs User Info'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Needs User Info'
Member

@BeornLeonard: will wait for a possible usecase before taking further actions.

@BeornLeonard: will wait for a possible usecase before taking further actions.
Author

@dr.sybren I'm not sure I understand, and perhaps there's something I'm missing.
When I click "Disable in Renders" in the outliner, and export an alembic with the option "Only Renderable Objects" checked, all the objects still get exported, regardless.

What am I missing?

@dr.sybren I'm not sure I understand, and perhaps there's something I'm missing. When I click "Disable in Renders" in the outliner, and export an alembic with the option "Only Renderable Objects" checked, all the objects still get exported, regardless. What am I missing?
Member

In #89594#1185927, @BeornLeonard wrote:
@dr.sybren I'm not sure I understand, and perhaps there's something I'm missing.
When I click "Disable in Renders" in the outliner, and export an alembic with the option "Only Renderable Objects" checked, all the objects still get exported, regardless.

What am I missing?

That option to only export renderable objects was broken for a long time.
If checked, it seemed to be working (objects marked non-renderable in the Outliner were pruned from the export), however unchecking that option did not include them in the export
But true, it changed - for the worse if you like - in a95f863596 which made it so if "renderable_only" is set, it will still export (is now more dependent on the Visible Objects option)
Atm. the Renderable Objects option does not do anything

Please try the Visible Objects option, does this work for you?

> In #89594#1185927, @BeornLeonard wrote: > @dr.sybren I'm not sure I understand, and perhaps there's something I'm missing. > When I click "Disable in Renders" in the outliner, and export an alembic with the option "Only Renderable Objects" checked, all the objects still get exported, regardless. > > What am I missing? That option to only export renderable objects was broken for a long time. If checked, it seemed to be working (objects marked non-renderable in the Outliner were pruned from the export), however unchecking that option did not include them in the export But true, it changed - for the worse if you like - in a95f863596 which made it so if "renderable_only" is set, it will still export (is now more dependent on the `Visible Objects` option) Atm. the `Renderable Objects` option **does not do anything** Please try the `Visible Objects` option, does this work for you?
Author

@lichtwerk
I tried to outline my use case in the original report, but here's some more detail:
In a production it is common to use low res geometry to give animators better performance.
In the outliner, the low res meshes are flagged as visible, but not renderable, and the full res meshes are often flagged in the opposite way.
(Actually the visibility is generally switchable as animators will want to see the high res mesh in the later stages of polish).
When it comes to exporting a mesh cache, we want only the high res meshes exported, and I would expect the exporter to ignore all meshes that are flagged as not renderable.

Does this clarify things?

@lichtwerk I tried to outline my use case in the original report, but here's some more detail: In a production it is common to use low res geometry to give animators better performance. In the outliner, the low res meshes are flagged as visible, but not renderable, and the full res meshes are often flagged in the opposite way. (Actually the visibility is generally switchable as animators will want to see the high res mesh in the later stages of polish). When it comes to exporting a mesh cache, we want only the high res meshes exported, and I would expect the exporter to ignore all meshes that are flagged as not renderable. Does this clarify things?
Member

In #89594#1185931, @BeornLeonard wrote:
@lichtwerk
I tried to outline my use case in the original report, but here's some more detail:
In a production it is common to use low res geometry to give animators better performance.
In the outliner, the low res meshes are flagged as visible, but not renderable, and the full res meshes are often flagged in the opposite way.
(Actually the visibility is generally switchable as animators will want to see the high res mesh in the later stages of polish).
When it comes to exporting a mesh cache, we want only the high res meshes exported, and I would expect the exporter to ignore all meshes that are flagged as not renderable.

Does this clarify things?

This can be achieved with the Visible Objects option.

> In #89594#1185931, @BeornLeonard wrote: > @lichtwerk > I tried to outline my use case in the original report, but here's some more detail: > In a production it is common to use low res geometry to give animators better performance. > In the outliner, the low res meshes are flagged as visible, but not renderable, and the full res meshes are often flagged in the opposite way. > (Actually the visibility is generally switchable as animators will want to see the high res mesh in the later stages of polish). > When it comes to exporting a mesh cache, we want only the high res meshes exported, and I would expect the exporter to ignore all meshes that are flagged as not renderable. > > Does this clarify things? This can be achieved with the `Visible Objects` option.
Author

@lichtwerk :
Ok, I see what you and @dr.sybren were getting at.
The "visible objects" flag does indeed stop the non renderable objects from exporting.

In that case, can I suggest changing those labels? Right now it doesn't match the labels in the outliner, and seems a bit anti-intuitive to the user.
But any way, this solves my issue for now. Thanks

@lichtwerk : Ok, I see what you and @dr.sybren were getting at. The "visible objects" flag does indeed stop the non renderable objects from exporting. In that case, can I suggest changing those labels? Right now it doesn't match the labels in the outliner, and seems a bit anti-intuitive to the user. But any way, this solves my issue for now. Thanks
Member

@dr.sybren: so plan of attack is:

  • remove Renderable Objects option
  • improve UI text of Visible Objects? replace "Export only objects in visible layers" with "Export only objects visible in rendering"?
@dr.sybren: so plan of attack is: - remove `Renderable Objects` option - improve UI text of `Visible Objects`? replace "Export only objects in visible layers" with "Export only objects visible in rendering"?

Yes, let's remove "Renderable Objects".

As for the "Visible Objects" option, what I think is a better approach is what I aready added to the USD exporter: a choice whether Render or Viewport evaluation is used. When that choice is explicit, it's also clear which visibility actually matters.

These could be done in two separate commits, as I think the removal of "Renderable Objects" is already a good start.

Yes, let's remove "Renderable Objects". As for the "Visible Objects" option, what I think is a better approach is what I aready added to the USD exporter: a choice whether Render or Viewport evaluation is used. When that choice is explicit, it's also clear which visibility actually matters. These could be done in two separate commits, as I think the removal of "Renderable Objects" is already a good start.
Author

@dr.sybren Just checked out the USD exporter, and indeed that is a much more clear way of presenting it, IMHO.

@dr.sybren Just checked out the USD exporter, and indeed that is a much more clear way of presenting it, IMHO.

This issue was referenced by cb1601ddf3

This issue was referenced by cb1601ddf37f41f2ff653e66e20fd673c2e720f1

This issue was referenced by 834e87af7b

This issue was referenced by 834e87af7bbf719e18acd7ae8adc0d9403681a1b

This issue was referenced by 7b94e7cca4

This issue was referenced by 7b94e7cca49ab4f84149215ed452fd4978f46d27

This issue was referenced by 8f5a4a2453

This issue was referenced by 8f5a4a2453887e37b51bb131176b0efbd0e9b42e
Member

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Resolved'
Member

So removed "Renderable Objects" and added the evaluation mode like in USD.
Will set this to resolved since all issues should be addressed now.

So removed "Renderable Objects" and added the evaluation mode like in USD. Will set this to resolved since all issues should be addressed now.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#89594
No description provided.