VSE: Adjustment Layer create new image #98057

Closed
opened 2022-05-12 00:18:13 +02:00 by hamza.SMA · 20 comments

System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19043-SP0 64 Bits
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 472.39

Blender Version
Broken: version: 3.1.2, branch: master, commit date: 2022-03-31 17:40, hash: cc66d1020c
Worked: (newest version of Blender that worked as expected)

Short description of error
Adjustment Layer create new image that is moved and i think maybe many things is affected by the same bug if they use same principal of work
2022-05-11 23-00-34.mp4

(( i notice when we apply for example glow effect to sth it affect all chosen resolution and not the actual size of the image 'scaled or not' so also moving the image make the the effect reapplied more performance issue happen ......))
2022-05-11 23-07-18.mp4
i'm not a programmer but that maybe is due to a temporary image get created every time basic changes like position or others happen
this image has the resolution of output and not the image also the temporary image is fixed and deosn't transforme informations from original image .... maybe my thinking has no sens about how things is working in vse..
ADJUSTMENT LAYER .blend

**System Information** Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19043-SP0 64 Bits Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 472.39 **Blender Version** Broken: version: 3.1.2, branch: master, commit date: 2022-03-31 17:40, hash: `cc66d1020c` Worked: (newest version of Blender that worked as expected) **Short description of error** Adjustment Layer create new image that is moved and i think maybe many things is affected by the same bug if they use same principal of work [2022-05-11 23-00-34.mp4](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F13069512/2022-05-11_23-00-34.mp4) (( i notice when we apply for example glow effect to sth it affect all chosen resolution and not the actual size of the image 'scaled or not' so also moving the image make the the effect reapplied more performance issue happen ......)) [2022-05-11 23-07-18.mp4](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F13069527/2022-05-11_23-07-18.mp4) i'm not a programmer but that maybe is due to a temporary image get created every time basic changes like position or others happen this image has the resolution of output and not the image also the temporary image is fixed and deosn't transforme informations from original image .... maybe my thinking has no sens about how things is working in vse.. [ADJUSTMENT LAYER .blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F13069541/ADJUSTMENT_LAYER_.blend)
Author

Added subscriber: @hamza-el-barmaki

Added subscriber: @hamza-el-barmaki
Member

Added subscriber: @OmarEmaraDev

Added subscriber: @OmarEmaraDev
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs User Info'
Member

According to the documentation:

The Adjustment Layer strip works like a regular input file strip except for the fact, that it considers all strips below it as its input.

So you are correct in saying that the adjustment layer create a new image by compositing the strips under it. The newly created image is then considered as a normal imported image which can be used as a strip for processing and editing.
VSE can also skip transformations if they have no effect when rendering strips, so that's why there might be a performance difference.

Is this is the answer you were looking for?

According to the documentation: > The Adjustment Layer strip works like a regular input file strip except for the fact, that it considers all strips below it as its input. So you are correct in saying that the adjustment layer create a new image by compositing the strips under it. The newly created image is then considered as a normal imported image which can be used as a strip for processing and editing. VSE can also skip transformations if they have no effect when rendering strips, so that's why there might be a performance difference. Is this is the answer you were looking for?
Author

I @OmarEmaraDev
as i now adjustment Layer change values options in strip (sidebar) to all strips below adjustment layer and not create a temporary image ( i 'm not a programmer and don't know how things work in the background but if Adjustment layer create image then the original images must be hidden and sidebar show only options of temporary image in order to play as we like )

I @OmarEmaraDev as i now adjustment Layer change values options in strip (sidebar) to all strips below adjustment layer and not create a temporary image ( i 'm not a programmer and don't know how things work in the background but if Adjustment layer create image then the original images must be hidden and sidebar show only options of temporary image in order to play as we like )
Author

here a video show effect expected
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIRkDheGsv8 starts 2.15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJOyzqahDow starts at 1:30

here a video show effect expected https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIRkDheGsv8 starts 2.15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJOyzqahDow starts at 1:30
Member

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Needs User Info' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'
Member

Added subscriber: @iss

Added subscriber: @iss
Member

So the issue is that strips that were rendered into the input of the adjustment strip are still visible, but you expect them to no longer be rendered because they are now represented by the adjustment strip.
Not sure about this behavior, so tagging the module for more information. Maybe @iss can take over this report.

So the issue is that strips that were rendered into the input of the adjustment strip are still visible, but you expect them to no longer be rendered because they are now represented by the adjustment strip. Not sure about this behavior, so tagging the module for more information. Maybe @iss can take over this report.
Member

@hamza-el-barmaki Actually, can't you just change the blend mode of the adjustment strip to be Replace?

@hamza-el-barmaki Actually, can't you just change the blend mode of the adjustment strip to be Replace?
Author

In #98057#1357410, @OmarEmaraDev wrote:
@hamza-el-barmaki Actually, can't you just change the blend mode of the adjustment strip to be Replace?

your right it works thank you very much.... helpful team..

> In #98057#1357410, @OmarEmaraDev wrote: > @hamza-el-barmaki Actually, can't you just change the blend mode of the adjustment strip to be Replace? your right it works thank you very much.... helpful team..
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Archived'
Member

Good to hear.
Since this have no performance implications and multiple options are given, we can archive this.

Good to hear. Since this have no performance implications and multiple options are given, we can archive this.

Added subscribers: @Sergey, @tintwotin

Added subscribers: @Sergey, @tintwotin

Though the issue here can be fixed by changing blend mode, it is very likely other users will encounter the same problem and report it again as a bug. If the ambition of the VSE is that "it should just work", then the default blend mode for Adjustment Layer should probably be Replace.

This problem was introduced when the default blend mode was recently changed for all strips, and the mentioned problem wasn't taken into account. Actually, more strips may be negatively be affected by this change of the default blend mode ex. Multicam strips should properly not be Alpha Over either.

When Blende Mode defaults were changed the specification of Adjustment Layer using Cross as Blend mode was removed - and it shouldn't: https://developer.blender.org/D12952
image.png
I would say that this is a regression. IMO, @Sergey or @iss should have a chance to reflect on this report before it is closed. @OmarEmaraDev could you open the report again?

Though the issue here can be fixed by changing blend mode, it is very likely other users will encounter the same problem and report it again as a bug. If the ambition of the VSE is that "it should just work", then the default blend mode for Adjustment Layer should probably be Replace. This problem was introduced when the default blend mode was recently changed for all strips, and the mentioned problem wasn't taken into account. Actually, more strips may be negatively be affected by this change of the default blend mode ex. Multicam strips should properly not be Alpha Over either. When Blende Mode defaults were changed the specification of Adjustment Layer using Cross as Blend mode was removed - and it shouldn't: https://developer.blender.org/D12952 ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F13073588/image.png) I would say that this is a regression. IMO, @Sergey or @iss should have a chance to reflect on this report before it is closed. @OmarEmaraDev could you open the report again?
Member

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Archived' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Confirmed'

I agree that this was not great change, so will consider this as a bug.

I agree that this was not great change, so will consider this as a bug.

This issue was referenced by 8eda776eef

This issue was referenced by 8eda776eef3823aebb5bc71520831418e6703a1c

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'

Changed status from 'Confirmed' to: 'Resolved'
Richard Antalik self-assigned this 2022-05-23 23:37:34 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#98057
No description provided.