+1 for face beveling

@Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) You're a saviour, thanks for the tip on finding the keymap entry. At least not all is lost. 🙂
And yes, it definitely needs an easy way to change those keymap options.

@Andrii Symkin (pembem22) Can we have a checkbox in the preferences to swap "hotkeys" between orbit and zoom? When checked, ctrl + two fingers activates the orbit and the regular two fingers activates the zoom. That would solve this regression.

Keep in mind, we are not talking about zooming in a document or something, this is blender. You literally zoom in/out hundred of times in the 3dview/2dviews/nodes etc, and doing that by pinching is really really painful. The old way of zooming was really painless.

Wait, what? it's not a bug?
Someone needs to do something. we need an option to zoom like before
Pinch to zoom is a nightmare
Remember that blender is not a mobile app

Hey, this is high priority material folks

In T93226#1273630, @Thomas Dinges (dingto) wrote:

Removed the last comment. Please use other channels for user feedback and feature requests: https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Communication/Contact#User_Feedback_and_Requests

please don't
can't it be the default just for right click select users or something?
this goes against all the standards
why blender has to be always the weird software? why?
this is really bad

That's a poor report imo.
That's why I think that "video only" reports shouldn't be allowed.
The description of the error and the steps to reproduce the error should always, always be written, even if a video is included.

In D12155#314509, @Aaron Carlisle (Blendify) wrote:

How is this different than the extrude to cursor tool or the draw curve tool? Perhaps maybe the functionality of these tools should be improved rather than creating a new tool.

In T89922#1192848, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

this interactive widget is very similar to those other ones like for example when you press "F" to adjust the brush radius, so it kinda doesn't make sense to have a button or something else in the UI to call it... imho...

In T89328#1179991, @dearghyanitro@gmail.com (Arghya_De) wrote:

But this worked in Blender 2.92

In T87668#1149748, @Grigoriy Titaev (gtitaev) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons), For now, this solves the problem, 2 columns is enough for the most popular screen resolution. This is a simple and quick solution.

2 columns won't solve anything.
Here's what needs to be done: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/the-tools-brush-workflow/9111/17
😉

In D4960#280473, @Henrik Dick (weasel) wrote:

First of all, I want to repeat, that NODES ARE SIMPLER to use!

What?
Nodes will never be as easy to use and intuitive like a modifier. Imo, this should be implemented as a modifier first, AND later on as nodes as well.

In T86723#1132963, @Aaron Carlisle (Blendify) wrote:

This should also be placed in the upper right to be consistent with the 3D Viewport navigation helpers.

nothing strange here. this is how this tool works, it moves the points to the line
google "clipping brushes" to know more about this type of tool

the default behavior is for Blender to hide the visible Gizmos. This is fine

maybe that's because of the crazy geometry you got there, and the boole operation fails?

Open the provided .blend file,

where is it?

In D9227#228446, @Erik Abrahamsson (erik85) wrote:

Added the move function to line gestures too

Now we are talking! Amazing 👌

@CobraA (CobraA) @Adam Smith (Adam.S) Please don't destroy my hopes guys 😂 my fingers are crossed day and night for this. 🤞
That's the best thing since sliced bread

5 it is! 👌

In D9227#228064, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

Does it also work with the line gestures tools like the Line Project tool of sculpt mode? This tool desperately needs this functionality.

I'd really like to see a horizontal version of this.

In D9115#228023, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

Don't think we should add an option for this, I don't think we have a similar one and we can just have good defaults.

Why not? I mean, among the most used 3d apps, blender is the only one that don't expose that setting, why is that? This is a crucial setting of any type of transform tools. Blender really needs it.
Maybe not now, but you guys really should consider adding it soon.

In D9115#224804, @Aaron Carlisle (Blendify) wrote:

Holding shift should limit the rotation to 5 degree difference

This is how this patch is working right now?

Somebody tell me this is still alive. ✌

it snaps the angle of the line to 45 degree increments, which
is defined in code. This should be easy to expose in the UI in the future
if we need to

Yes please. Or at least make it 5 degree by default in sculpt mode. 45 is not very pratical.

In D6961#190086, @Michael Soluyanov (crantisz) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons) only opacity

Tbh, opacity is more than enough.
Not sure what people want, really. 😒

Papercut?
This issue really looks a lot more serious than that.

And what's with the renaming? It kinda makes no sense now.

In T77116#940796, @Germano Cavalcante (mano-wii) wrote:

This is not a bug

This is a bug, because it worked before, and now it's broken. Even @Pablo Vazquez (pablovazquez) acknowledged that on blender chat.
This bug was introduced during the implementation of the scrubbing area in the animation editors. I commented about it there D4654#110441 but the playhead issue was never fixed.

@Michael Soluyanov (crantisz) Did you manage to get this thing going?

In rB122cb1aea82362d1b2ff3dda4fc7d309933308be#267371, @Daniel Santana (dgsantana) wrote:

Another note, there seems to be some icon clipping on the header.

This is an old papercut.

Lag on big scenes happens sometimes. How many polys/objects your scene have?

In D7616#183624, @James Pale (jamesP) wrote:

We can have this as a separate button

The global brush palette button actually should be in the toolbar.
Along those lines:

In D4960#182558, @Vitor Balbio (vitorbalbio) wrote:

What about the CSG options?

You might think this is weird, but this is how it works in other 3d apps too.

In D7410#180999, @CobraA (CobraA) wrote:

made brightness difference between the text and the numbers so they're not on the same level.

Awesome!

In D7410#180950, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

It felt forgotten, that's why I asked.
But don't worry, it won't happen again.

Any news on a fix for this?
I suppose it should be fixed for 2.83?

Any news on this?

@Hans Goudey (HooglyBoogly) I heard you're now doing UI work, so I hope you can tackle this precious task. I think you got the skills, am I right? hehehe

The music destroyed my ears. 🤣
A little warning would be nice. lol

In T75697#909948, @Ankit Meel (ankitm) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons) but it's reported to be working fine in 2.82

Yes I can confirm.
It seems like the multires has some shrinkage problems, as seen here too: T75631

I can reproduce this as well.
Big issue.

This is great.
I hope it can support UVs in the future.

@Julian Eisel (Severin) There's really nothing that can be done for it to work at least in sculpt mode for the time being?
This functionality is really crucial there. 🙁

In D7055#173887, @Debuk (Debuk) wrote:

I am having high hopes for this.

Any news on this?

Will this be an optional setting? I'm really not a fan of this change to be honest.

In D7271#175845, @Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) wrote:

I think there could be more fine control over stats to display in the preferences, with a simple on/off per 3D viewport in the overlays popover.

In D7271#175799, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

This statistics stuff actually deserves it's own popover panel, with individual checkboxes for each stats info. That way we could enable the ones needed at the given moment, instead of just one global checkbox in the Overlays that enables everything. 😉

Ah, that's unfortunate. It would be nice if it could follow the standards.
Btw, what happens when the file path is too long, the file name will vanish from view?
Also, will it be hardcoded or we'll be able to choose between displaying the file path/file name only? I can see people refusing to show the title bar on screenshots just because they don't want to reveal their pc's username. LOL

In D7267#175765, @Harley Acheson (harley) wrote:

seems to work okay?

In D7267#175259, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

why is it bad to have it there?

Feature request, not a bug, right? Then better post there: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/sculpt-mode-feedback/7420

In T74692#895792, @Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) wrote:

Mask > Invert Mask causes a similar slowdown in Blender 2.82.

In D7055#170888, @Debuk (Debuk) wrote:

If the key was held long enough the tool will stay active after key release.

I can confirm that.

You deserve a medal for that 🥇

I can confirm that too. Massive slowdown in sculpt mode with high poly meshes. 🙁

this?
https://devtalk.blender.org/t/quick-effect-smoke-not-showing-up/12123

In D6883#169369, @Peter Fog (tintwotin) wrote:

Please compare the selection of handles in this patch with the Edit mode in the 3D View when selecting a vertex, where there are no action zone markings, no hover mouse cursor highlights, no mouse cursor snapping or changes in mouse cursor look to help users guess where to click:

@Rodger Davis (RodDavis) Like I said, you don't get it.
This feature here is totally unrelated to the other brushes/shift key or the asset manager. Please read the description carefully, to fully understand what this feature really is. This is ancient functionality on keymaps of other softwares.

Yes, it does crash

In D6515#168150, @Rodger Davis (RodDavis) wrote:

I like the way it's going.