In T87668#1149748, @Grigoriy Titaev (gtitaev) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons), For now, this solves the problem, 2 columns is enough for the most popular screen resolution. This is a simple and quick solution.

2 columns won't solve anything.
Here's what needs to be done: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/the-tools-brush-workflow/9111/17
😉

In D4960#280473, @Henrik Dick (weasel) wrote:

First of all, I want to repeat, that NODES ARE SIMPLER to use!

What?
Nodes will never be as easy to use and intuitive like a modifier. Imo, this should be implemented as a modifier first, AND later on as nodes as well.

In T86723#1132963, @Aaron Carlisle (Blendify) wrote:

This should also be placed in the upper right to be consistent with the 3D Viewport navigation helpers.

nothing strange here. this is how this tool works, it moves the points to the line
google "clipping brushes" to know more about this type of tool

the default behavior is for Blender to hide the visible Gizmos. This is fine

maybe that's because of the crazy geometry you got there, and the boole operation fails?

Open the provided .blend file,

where is it?

In D9227#228446, @Erik Abrahamsson (erik85) wrote:

Added the move function to line gestures too

Now we are talking! Amazing 👌

@CobraA (CobraA) @Adam Smith (Adam.S) Please don't destroy my hopes guys 😂 my fingers are crossed day and night for this. 🤞
That's the best thing since sliced bread

5 it is! 👌

In D9227#228064, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

Does it also work with the line gestures tools like the Line Project tool of sculpt mode? This tool desperately needs this functionality.

I'd really like to see a horizontal version of this.

In D9115#228023, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

Don't think we should add an option for this, I don't think we have a similar one and we can just have good defaults.

Why not? I mean, among the most used 3d apps, blender is the only one that don't expose that setting, why is that? This is a crucial setting of any type of transform tools. Blender really needs it.
Maybe not now, but you guys really should consider adding it soon.

In D9115#224804, @Aaron Carlisle (Blendify) wrote:

Holding shift should limit the rotation to 5 degree difference

This is how this patch is working right now?

Somebody tell me this is still alive. ✌

it snaps the angle of the line to 45 degree increments, which
is defined in code. This should be easy to expose in the UI in the future
if we need to

Yes please. Or at least make it 5 degree by default in sculpt mode. 45 is not very pratical.

In D6961#190086, @Michael Soluyanov (crantisz) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons) only opacity

Tbh, opacity is more than enough.
Not sure what people want, really. 😒

Papercut?
This issue really looks a lot more serious than that.

And what's with the renaming? It kinda makes no sense now.

In T77116#940796, @Germano Cavalcante (mano-wii) wrote:

This is not a bug

This is a bug, because it worked before, and now it's broken. Even @Pablo Vazquez (pablovazquez) acknowledged that on blender chat.
This bug was introduced during the implementation of the scrubbing area in the animation editors. I commented about it there D4654#110441 but the playhead issue was never fixed.

@Michael Soluyanov (crantisz) Did you manage to get this thing going?

In rB122cb1aea82362d1b2ff3dda4fc7d309933308be#267371, @Daniel Santana (dgsantana) wrote:

Another note, there seems to be some icon clipping on the header.

This is an old papercut.

Lag on big scenes happens sometimes. How many polys/objects your scene have?

In D7616#183624, @James Pale (jamesP) wrote:

We can have this as a separate button

The global brush palette button actually should be in the toolbar.
Along those lines:

In D4960#182558, @Vitor Balbio (vitorbalbio) wrote:

What about the CSG options?

You might think this is weird, but this is how it works in other 3d apps too.

In D7410#180999, @CobraA (CobraA) wrote:

made brightness difference between the text and the numbers so they're not on the same level.

Awesome!

In D7410#180950, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

It felt forgotten, that's why I asked.
But don't worry, it won't happen again.

Any news on a fix for this?
I suppose it should be fixed for 2.83?

Any news on this?

@Hans Goudey (HooglyBoogly) I heard you're now doing UI work, so I hope you can tackle this precious task. I think you got the skills, am I right? hehehe

The music destroyed my ears. 🤣
A little warning would be nice. lol

In T75697#909948, @Ankit Meel (ankitm) wrote:

@ThinkingPolygons (ThinkingPolygons) but it's reported to be working fine in 2.82

Yes I can confirm.
It seems like the multires has some shrinkage problems, as seen here too: T75631

I can reproduce this as well.
Big issue.

This is great.
I hope it can support UVs in the future.

@Julian Eisel (Severin) There's really nothing that can be done for it to work at least in sculpt mode for the time being?
This functionality is really crucial there. 🙁

In D7055#173887, @Debuk (Debuk) wrote:

I am having high hopes for this.

Any news on this?

Will this be an optional setting? I'm really not a fan of this change to be honest.

In D7271#175845, @Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) wrote:

I think there could be more fine control over stats to display in the preferences, with a simple on/off per 3D viewport in the overlays popover.

In D7271#175799, @TheRedWaxPolice (TheRedWaxPolice) wrote:

This statistics stuff actually deserves it's own popover panel, with individual checkboxes for each stats info. That way we could enable the ones needed at the given moment, instead of just one global checkbox in the Overlays that enables everything. 😉

Ah, that's unfortunate. It would be nice if it could follow the standards.
Btw, what happens when the file path is too long, the file name will vanish from view?
Also, will it be hardcoded or we'll be able to choose between displaying the file path/file name only? I can see people refusing to show the title bar on screenshots just because they don't want to reveal their pc's username. LOL

In D7267#175765, @Harley Acheson (harley) wrote:

seems to work okay?

In D7267#175259, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

why is it bad to have it there?

Feature request, not a bug, right? Then better post there: https://devtalk.blender.org/t/sculpt-mode-feedback/7420

In T74692#895792, @Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) wrote:

Mask > Invert Mask causes a similar slowdown in Blender 2.82.

In D7055#170888, @Debuk (Debuk) wrote:

If the key was held long enough the tool will stay active after key release.

I can confirm that.

You deserve a medal for that 🥇

I can confirm that too. Massive slowdown in sculpt mode with high poly meshes. 🙁

this?
https://devtalk.blender.org/t/quick-effect-smoke-not-showing-up/12123

In D6883#169369, @Peter Fog (tintwotin) wrote:

Please compare the selection of handles in this patch with the Edit mode in the 3D View when selecting a vertex, where there are no action zone markings, no hover mouse cursor highlights, no mouse cursor snapping or changes in mouse cursor look to help users guess where to click:

@Rodger Davis (RodDavis) Like I said, you don't get it.
This feature here is totally unrelated to the other brushes/shift key or the asset manager. Please read the description carefully, to fully understand what this feature really is. This is ancient functionality on keymaps of other softwares.

Yes, it does crash

In D6515#168150, @Rodger Davis (RodDavis) wrote:

I like the way it's going.

Yeah, opacity seems to be enough for this.
I don't recall blender having a way to change the shadow colors. There is a patch tho D754 that would add the ability to control the shadow colors, but it never happened. So I don't think shadow colors should be a requirement here.

So this minor hotkey issue is the thing preventing this from being committed? 👀

what's the hold up? 🤔

Pity. Mostly I just wanted to customize the icons of the tabs in properties editor.

In D4960#167171, @Martin Felke (scorpion81) wrote:

Update of diff for recent 2.83 master, no functional changes.
@Brecht Van Lommel (brecht) I would like a review for this to be included in 2.83

In D4569#167179, @Sebastian Parborg (zeddb) wrote:

What are the specific use cases for this change?

I would think that in most cases this could just be done manually in edit mode.

That's interesting.
Maybe you should add Jeroen Bakker (jbakker) as a reviewer, since he was the one who implemented that multi-layer matcap system D5335 ? 🤔

Can't reproduce.

Yes, this is good. 👍

Is this planned for 2.83, now that missed it's original target?

Nice.
And while you're at it, maybe in the future you could make a patch that implements Ctrl+L to activate the file path textbox as well?
This is pretty standard on pretty much anything, file browsers/web browsers etc. And requested very often too: https://blender.community/c/rightclickselect/Dqfbbc/

@Debuk (Debuk) That would be nice. Thank you.

In D6934#164786, @Harley Acheson (harley) wrote:

Why not test the patch and find out for yourself?

This is overkill IMHO.
Will this white color be themeable?
What if my dialog box is light/white, the text will be unreadable?

Does this affect the movie clip editor? I guess nah, but the graph/dopesheet view there has a very strong hardcoded grid that could benefit from something like this. 🤔

Are you guys sure face masks is a good name? That's confusing imo, since regular masks already exists.
I'd go with "face sets" or something along those lines. They are polygon groups after all.

Searching all operators is very important for the obvious reasons, so make sure this option will still be there somehow.

So what's the state of this patch?

T73575

And keeps increasing on each new line. 3, 6, 9, 12....

global brush palette (similar to 2.79)