In T74157#879972, @Demeter Dzadik (Mets) wrote:

I can think of cases when I'd rather not have to bother adding my operator to a menu just to make it searchable, particularly when developing the addon mainly for myself or my friends or my team, or when the addon is a single operator that doesn't really belong anywhere in the UI, etc.

If feasible I'd request that whenever possible relative paths be used in library definitions, both in "indexes", user defined folders or paths to assets.

In T74157, @William Reynish (billreynish) wrote:

Instead of searching all operators, we can simply search the menus instead.

In T54862, @William Reynish (billreynish) wrote:

In the list of tabs, only properties sections are shown that are common among the selected items.

In D6375#150437, @Charlie Jolly (charlie) wrote:

@Duarte Farrajota Ramos (duarteframos) this doesn’t disconnect the sockets so the name changes are not disruptive

While this works well in theory, in practice it becomes an annoyance, this is currently the case with dynamic socket names for the new Voronoi procedural texture.

In D6378#149076, @Harley Acheson (harley) wrote:

That's a really good idea. Do you mind if that is only shown if it is changed from default?

One entry I would like to see available in area menus is the option to reset UI zoom for the area.
It is easy to accidentaly change zoom level with Ctrl+MMB, but resetting it back to defaults is only possible through obscure hotkeys.
Most users aren't aware of it and it is not easy to find out that pressing Home will reset zoom back to default value.

In D6235, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

• Handles now always move with the key, regardless if they are selected or not.
• Selecting the key doesn't select the handles anymore, their selection is separate.
• Dragging a handle moves all selected handles on the same side.
• Changing the handle type with a key selected always applies the change to both handles.

There seems to be a bug since at least the 2.79 days where metaballs are not visible inside group instances. Probably fits into this task.

! In T71384#808089, @Jacques Lucke (JacquesLucke) wrote:
How about vectors of integers? I do not have a use case for it right now, does someone have an idea?

! In T71384#808078, @Jacques Lucke (JacquesLucke) wrote:
I agree. How are 2D and 3D vector of floats and ints called in "everyday language"?

Indeed agree, given the potential amount of data types colors alone may be insufficient, though most listed implementations have around 10 ~11 data types.
Mapping those to colors I think we could manage 10 different enough hues.

! In T71384, @Jacques Lucke (JacquesLucke) wrote:
Similar types should have similar names.
Should data type names be familiar to technical users?
What is a good compromise between precise names like int32 and simple names to be displayed in the UI like Integer?
Should there be two versions of every type name for different kinds of users?

This is a followup of a Blender Stack Exchange question and probably a dupe of

In T71185#802763, @Harley Acheson (harley) wrote:

It could be that all tabs are inactive in that state and you are required to clear the search, by clicking the “x”, to proceed as normal.

This will be a very welcome addition. Will these results be limited to properties that we can find in the properties window, or will they show results from other editors?

I'm not a developer or in any way speaking for the Blender Foundation, but from what I have seen on this topic they are generally not very receptive to adding new modifiers at all, unless they provide substancial functionality; and even then there have been quite a few highly desirable proposals that all got refused.
This does looks interesting however and could potentially provide useful features. If this is so close to the Mirror modifier however, then it should probably be implemented as modifier options in the existing Mirror modifier instead, rather than an entirely new one.

My most missed that still don't work as of 2.82 Alpha are the Object > Convert to and Object > Set Origin, most other are apparently working.

In D5802#135807, @Julian Eisel (Severin) wrote:

Wouldn't it be easier to scan with the eyes if the drive letter comes first, then the name?

@Harley Acheson (harley) Hey this actually got committed, congrats!
I'll be here if any further work is required in the cursors themselves.

In T62971#779766, @voxel9 wrote:

Did anyone try for a while to see how double-click in the empty area to go to parent folder works?

Sorry for the noise just wanted to chime in and in name of all the community thank @Vladimir Spivak (cwolf3d) for these improvements.
This is an important tool for architects and designers working with Blender and we really appreciate your work.

Really like the direction this took, congratulations, this is an improvement of what we had previously.

In T52668#769527, @Campbell Barton (campbellbarton) wrote:

If objects are being loaded into local view unintentionally it makes local-view operations unpredictable.

I don't really use background images myself much ("asking for a friend"), but for the sake of documenting facts I'll post it here also.
Some users seem to miss an option to include images while in local view; this came up in Blender Stack Exchange a few times

Some comments on this: I don't think it is 2.8 related, 2.79 and previous were equally slow.

I did think about Susanne but it seemed a little tacky, and it is relatively complex in terms of geometry, might not look that good as line art or at smaller scales

Your attempts aren't bad at all, I found most quite adequate.

Currently on vacations I decided to play a little more just for fun.
I wanted to try making an animated "Busy" cursor that was somewhat Blender specific without being too literal.
The idea of a spinning default cube seemed minimal enough but recognizable.