Mon, Nov 12
please,fix bevel profile option for curve,so that i could use custom curve shape,for making sweep object,in blender 2.79 - it work without issue.
i cannot use custom profile shapes for bevel curve,it only convert original curve,but shape profile cause object to dissapear,after conversion to mesh output,only mesh edges are left
This face count should be written back to the original modifier for display in the UI, instead of the COW modifiers.
Sun, Nov 11
Thu, Nov 8
Mon, Oct 29
The new dependency graph can indeed handle this case is since it's default and the only one in upcoming 2.8 release considering this issue solved.
Wed, Oct 24
This will actually be solved by addressing T57371, so no need to keep this as a separate report...
Tue, Oct 23
couple of notes:
asserts here (2.8 specific):
Mon, Oct 22
Wed, Oct 17
Confirmed (in both 2.79 and 2.8), will have a look...
Oct 13 2018
Alright thanks for your help, I appreciate the timely response. Maybe one day this could be implemented (and like you said, a check box could be an effective solution, if implemented correctly), but I love the work the dev team does, especially on 2.8 and I agree that this is not a high priority feature.
It's not that easy because the mesh doesn't have volume data for material assignments.
Ah, I see now, though the way it works is slightly unintuitive, as materials are pulled from the boolean brush instead of the object with the modifier.
For a use case where the target object has the desired materials already applied, this makes the boolean modifier significantly less useful.
Closing this because AFAIK it's not a bug. Try adding materials with the same name to the boolean brush object. It cuts with those materials:)
Oct 6 2018
I had the same problem
Aug 21 2018
Thanks, figured out that complex booleans should be done before on simple shapes and then all stuff unioned together afterwards.
Aug 20 2018
At first, check the geometry:
Aug 18 2018
Confirm, not only "Array" modifier, but also "Mirror" modifier.
Aug 5 2018
More than a week without reply or activity. Due to the policy of the tracker archiving for until required info/data are provided.
Jul 26 2018
Thanks for the report, but blender 2.79 won’t get any fix in that area. Can you please check if 2.8 also shows same issue?
Jul 22 2018
Just noticed that I've uploaded wrong .blend.
Corrected with one that does the thing.
Jul 18 2018
Oh! Ok, That's important. I'll contact you if I have to report a crash bug.
Thank you for the report. Currently we are aware of many issues in 2.8 and actively working to fix them. But since replying to reports takes time, we have decided to limit bug reports to crashing bugs only at this point in time.
Jul 17 2018
Jun 20 2018
Jun 19 2018
Jun 18 2018
Putting this on normal (so it doesnt appear untriaged...) because there is an issue [but only with old dependency graph...]
not an issue if you use the new dependency graph
(run blender from the commandline with the --enable-new-depsgraph option)
Jun 17 2018
May 30 2018
About the situation with subsurf and no 'use modfiier stack', not it is clearer to me. The reconnect in this case seems to work like this:
May 29 2018
@Philipp Oeser (lichtwerk) Yes, of course. Sorry in case I failed to follow the preferred procedures. No secret that I'm rather new around here.
Hi @Brecht Van Lommel (brecht), @omgold (omgold), I've seen you discuss this on the mailinglist (and I understand reaching out here as for some reason this report seemed to slip under the radar)
But: why not continue here? This way others (including me) can follow and participate much better.
Sorry for the wall of text, but pasting from the mailinglist, so it doesnt get lost...
May 28 2018
sorry for the duplicate and thanks for the answer :)