IIRC this add-on is not part of the official blender distribution, so we cannot support it here, so I'm going to close the report.

But on 2.79 it ahd something on the list. Thumbnails with "no image" and the sizes.
On 2.8 there is NOTHING. I had to use 2.79 to get the objects and export

This is not a bug, but a restriction from BF to not include thumbnails into source.
A setup step is required to render thumbs,
user prefs -> add-ons -> archipack -> Setup actions -> render thumbs.

Not ported yet to 2.8.

• Are we talking about 2.79? Or 2.8?
  • (archimesh hasnt been ported to 2.8 afaics)

Confirmed,
@stephen leger (stephen_leger): mind checking on this one?

Actually (as far as I can see) this addon doesnt provide any functionality that is not builtin already.
Even if you fix the scene.master_collection vs. scene.collection issue you will run into asserts because all operators already exist in blender [now in C] and going further if you fix that as well, you will see that it is the exact same "Collections" panel that we already have...

Raised it on Right-Click

Thanks for the suggestion, but we do not accept feature requests or suggestions on this tracker (use forums or bf-funboard ML for that).

Closing because report is empty. If you think you found a bug, please provide all the requested information.

Confirmed, will have a look...

I did roundtrips for gltf, fbx, colldada for the standard setup. None of them did a good job of preserving the shader. It would be nice if it were achievable to remedy this. Adding those adjustment nodes would only complicate that. The goal should be to make the import as convinient as possible while preserving the_correct_PBR_setup.
My suggestion would be to remove the gamma node for roughness (isn't a colorramp more usefull anyway?) as well as the multiply node connecting AO and base color.

We only use High for urgent issues.

I'm changing the status on this from "Incomplete" because I've supplied the FBX files needed to test this and resolve it. I've changed the Priority to "High" because this issue severely impacts interoperability with other 3D applications. With Blender having adopted LMB as a standard, it's clear that 2.8 is designed to appeal to new Blender users. Those coming from other applications will need a working FBX importer in order to migrate assets and take advantage of Blender's powerful toolset.

Think it would be best for @Florian Meyer (testscreenings) to review this as the texture setup is his code.

We were typing at the same time here, sorry...

There is no information here regarding an error whatsoever.
(archimesh is not even ported over to 2.8 as far as I can see).

Hi guys,

commited rBA08d30a13bf6

Empty reports can be closed immediately… not worth spending more time on those.

• MISSING INFO

Closing because report is empty. If you think you found a bug, please carefully follow the instructions.
https://developer.blender.org/maniphest/task/edit/form/2/

Here is what the animation should look like.

Sure thing. Check these out. The FBX should load into Blender like it does into Maya, UE4, etc. However it does not, as you can see in the attached screen shot.

@Ivaylo Gogov (ivaydesign) In the past few days there have been major improvements to the export settings, but unfortunately a serious bug has crept in with the "Save Settings" feature. I believe this will be fixed in the next few days.

Alright, Thanks folks for taking care of it. Lots of love.

@Brecht Van Lommel (brecht): doing it for all UV layers: +1
@Fahad Hasan (cgvirus) : there are some other minor things (e.g. annotations), will do as well...

This should loop over ob.data.uv_layers and adjust all uv layers. There is no need to tie this to materials or textures, it's not clear why the original code did that.

No problem, F2 and Bsurface are two of the most important and unique tools for retopo in Blender. And it should be included in 2.8 officially. Let me know if there are more fix please. Would be great for the entire community.

regarding texture_slots / uv_textures removal: I think this needs a different fix though (otherwise the whole Adjust UV functionality of the addon is broken/obsolete...)

• This is a conversion from 2.79 to 2.8. This is my first patch submission to Blender. Sorry if it's a wrong type of post.
• Although I am familiar with git but can't understand how should I create a diff as I can't make my repository/fork here.
• It seems that texture slot has been updated in 2.8. Not sure about the inner workings of texture panel of 2.8.