I don't think this is a bug. The reason why the dimensions and shape of the rock change is the fact that it is constructed using a series of displacement modifiers that are evaluated in the local coordinates of the object, so it follows that a change in the scale of the object would affect the evaluation, shape, and consequently dimensions.
You should either apply the modifiers, leave the object scale, or scale the displacement textures to compensate for the new scale.

Can you check if the keymap existing in the preferences?
Can you open the Blender console and see if there are any error messages when you press the shortcut? Window > Toggle System Console.

@jorg peters (surfacionado)
Hi, somehow the patches around extraordinary vertices are not generated.

Looks like the Bezier handle lengths are not computed correctly.

i digged down a bit more into the issue. it seems this happen only if you don't name the rig. This is related to naming.
the task is so reporting 2 separate issues with are somehow generically related just because naming is involved.

Yes as mentioned in message #2 of this thread by Patrick Huang (phuang1024).

So, @Keenao (Keenao), to better understand the issue and make it clear to coders, what you are reporting is:

Thank you very much for taking the time to look at my case. I appreciate it.

@Keenao (Keenao),

Nope, "Rig name" isn't in the advanced panel. You would find "target rig" which requires an object, we don't have "rig name" as a string anymore.

Sorry, you are right, didn’t get it. For the rig name seems that this patch https://developer.blender.org/D14757 is already in the plans to restore the input field on first generate. Please follow the thread under the patch and report possible other limitations.

Thanks for the report. I can confirm. Maybe 'UNDO' is missing from bl_options?

Hi again,

In the latest version of the add-on (Rigify) I couldn't find where to set a name for my rig... Other than "rig" that is. (The documentation doesn't mention the old field either)
Where is it? If it's gone it's very very very important to bring it back as it's impossible to generate a rig in a blender file containing a linked rigified model. <- This is the number one workflow breaking - no walkaround reason.

CC @Ivan Cappiello (icappiello), @Alexander Gavrilov (angavrilov)

Just adding myself so that I don't forget about it.

Just adding myself so that I don't forget about it.

I didn't even know the output can in fact replace the viewer emission node, but it seems to work indeed.
Not having the viewer node dangling around does improve the usabilty. I also tested with node groups, and there it seems to work even better. the old viewer node polluted the node tree there, so I like this a lot better!

I think it makes a lot of sense and it seems to work fine.

In D15350#415244, @Lillya (Lillya) wrote:

One feature that may be lost with this is the exposure compensation.

This report does not contain all the requested information, which is required for us to investigate the issue.

Please fix this!!!

bug in dxf format

This report does not contain all the requested information, which is required for us to investigate the issue.

This report does not contain all the requested information, which is required for us to investigate the issue.

One feature that may be lost with this is the exposure compensation.