Cleanup: Correct order of guard and lock in moviecache_valfree
Fix own mistake in rB7061d1e39fe In my attempt to quickly address T92838, along with the original bug, I made a nonsensical choice to use the limiter lock to guard the check against the cache item itself. While harmless, it is not necessary and semantically wrong / potentially confusing to future readers of the code. Differential Revision: https://developer.blender.org/D13122
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff5630b7fa
commit
0564b19ff4
Notes:
blender-bot
2023-02-14 11:08:33 +01:00
Referenced by issue #93479, 3.0 Potential candidates for corrective releases
|
@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ static void moviecache_valfree(void *val)
|
|||
|
||||
PRINT("%s: cache '%s' free item %p buffer %p\n", __func__, cache->name, item, item->ibuf);
|
||||
|
||||
BLI_mutex_lock(&limitor_lock);
|
||||
if (item->c_handle) {
|
||||
BLI_mutex_lock(&limitor_lock);
|
||||
MEM_CacheLimiter_unmanage(item->c_handle);
|
||||
BLI_mutex_unlock(&limitor_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BLI_mutex_unlock(&limitor_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (item->ibuf) {
|
||||
IMB_freeImBuf(item->ibuf);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue