blender
/
blender
129
397
Fork 571
Code Issues 6.2k Pull Requests 751 Projects 19 Wiki Activity

Depsgraph: Re-hook duplicgroup relation to final transform operation 

Transform evaluation doesn't not depend on objects which are being duplicated,
so should not be any regressions here.

The whole relation should probably be gone as it's kind of rooting back to
legacy times, but that would need more clear research and investigation and
regression testing.
This commit is contained in:
Sergey Sharybin 2018-06-21 15:47:55 +02:00
parent ad42c358f8
commit a0f1bd8ed1
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
source/blender/depsgraph/intern/builder/deg_builder_relations.cc
View File

@ -464,9 +464,9 @@ void DepsgraphRelationBuilder::build_collection(
}
}
const bool group_done = built_map_.checkIsBuiltAndTag(collection);
OperationKey object_local_transform_key(object != NULL ? &object->id : NULL,
OperationKey object_transform_final_key(object != NULL ? &object->id : NULL,
DEG_NODE_TYPE_TRANSFORM,
DEG_OPCODE_TRANSFORM_LOCAL);
DEG_OPCODE_TRANSFORM_FINAL);
if (!group_done) {
LISTBASE_FOREACH (CollectionObject *, cob, &collection->gobject) {
if (allow_restrict_flags) {
@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void DepsgraphRelationBuilder::build_collection(
FOREACH_COLLECTION_VISIBLE_OBJECT_RECURSIVE_BEGIN(collection, ob, graph_->mode)
{
ComponentKey dupli_transform_key(&ob->id, DEG_NODE_TYPE_TRANSFORM);
add_relation(dupli_transform_key, object_local_transform_key, "Dupligroup");
add_relation(dupli_transform_key, object_transform_final_key, "Dupligroup");
}
FOREACH_COLLECTION_VISIBLE_OBJECT_RECURSIVE_END;
}