The problem has not been improved

New hair system Will it break away from the particle system.

@zhixiong.zhang (Blender_Cool) It means it is no longer in active development and will not receive future updates.

"given that the particle system is marked as End of Life" What does this sentence mean?

@zhixiong.zhang (Blender_Cool) Those issues will likely be solved in the new system, yes.

Will the new hair system in blender3.2 replace the current hair, and after that, will the hair dynamics problem be solved?

Can you just hide the Kink menu from the user, then? All of the non-functional/broken features in Blender that still have a functional UI element makes for a very messy, confusing user experience....

Any update on this?

Thanks for the report. Marking this as known issue since it depends on the rigid body system which at the moment has no active developer. I'm tagging Sergej here anyways in case he wants to tackle any of those. Anyone wlse interested on that can also join the geometry nodes meetings to get onboarded.

Thanks for the report. Marking this as known issue since it depends on the rigid body system which at the moment has no active developer. I'm tagging Sergej here anyways in case he wants to tackle any of those. Anyone wlse interested on that can also join the geometry nodes meetings to get onboarded.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those bugs as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those bugs as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those bugs as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those bugs as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those bugs as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those reports as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

Mantaflow (fluid simulator) has no active developer at the moment. Moving those reports as known issues so at least other users can find their issues already reported.

upbge has a method - to construct a physics shape from the evaluated geometry in bullet

Thanks for the report. I have hope that the elusive more general simulation system will solve problems like this.
In the meantime, I don't think the issue with the current rigid body system is likely to be solved unfortunately.
At least I don't think it's worth having two similar reports for it anyway. I'll merge this with T91183.

Thanks for the detailed report! We split this report to multiple simpler reports in T89431 and T95928. We will track each report individually in its task.

If you have a smoke simulation already baked, then baking a point cloud will also involve evaluating the smoke simulation as well, which can be seen in the execution profile. Maybe this could be optimized if there is no dependency between the two. But this does not look like a bug.

I can replicate that. Duplicating a passive object and then changing it to active will cause the object to be in a bad state, changing any property of the object makes it update to its valid state.

@Fernando Alcala (TriFractal) Thanks for clarification, I can see this much better with higher resolution. Will merge this report then.

It's because you simulated it at a lower resolution, making the blocks almost fill the hourglass. As I mentioned in the detailed report, this matters.

I guess I could merge this report, but I am not sure whether it is equivalent - I can reproduce T94425, but not this one.

You should merge this report to T94425, I describe the issue better there. And I can still reproduce on the latest 3.1 beta and 3.2 alpha.

@HEYPictures (HEYPictures) I checked with few builds, from older 3.1 to latest and can't reproduce this issue. Can you check if it happens with latest alpha?

Mantaflow: maybe not.
But a new system for physics is on the roadmap for this year, see https://code.blender.org/2022/01/strategic-targets-2022/