Use widget rollover to hide/add UI feedback #38070

Closed
opened 2014-01-04 20:58:20 +01:00 by William Reynish · 24 comments

In Blender, hovering the cursor over a UI item highlights it. This is quite nice, because it's clear which item will be interacted with when clicked.

However, some of the UI widgets don't give proper feedback when hovering the cursor. For example, number fields highlight the entire widget when hovering over it, even though it consists of three distinct areas (left arrow, text field, right arrow). The problem is that the current highlighting gives a false sense that clicking the button anywhere does the same thing. This can lead to user error and confusion when attempting to interact with these fields.

Also, when buttons have no background (icon only), there's no highlighting and pressed state. This makes it unclear if a button has been pressed or not.

Proposed solution:
Use rollover to hide/add useful feedback:
Number fields:
number_field_rollover.png

A moving example of this can be seen below:
(click to view)

number_field_rollover3.gif

Icon-only buttons:
Button_no_bg.png

Highlighting can also be added more places, such as the headers in the Properties editor:
(click to view)
panel_anim_render.gif

In Blender, hovering the cursor over a UI item highlights it. This is quite nice, because it's clear which item will be interacted with when clicked. However, some of the UI widgets don't give proper feedback when hovering the cursor. For example, number fields highlight the entire widget when hovering over it, even though it consists of three distinct areas (left arrow, text field, right arrow). The problem is that the current highlighting gives a false sense that clicking the button anywhere does the same thing. This can lead to user error and confusion when attempting to interact with these fields. Also, when buttons have no background (icon only), there's no highlighting and pressed state. This makes it unclear if a button has been pressed or not. **Proposed solution:** Use rollover to hide/add useful feedback: Number fields: ![number_field_rollover.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F61208/number_field_rollover.png) A moving example of this can be seen below: (click to view) ![number_field_rollover3.gif](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F61925/number_field_rollover3.gif) Icon-only buttons: ![Button_no_bg.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F60661/Button_no_bg.png) Highlighting can also be added more places, such as the headers in the Properties editor: (click to view) ![panel_anim_render.gif](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F61900/panel_anim_render.gif)
Author
Member

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @billrey

Added subscriber: @billrey

Added subscriber: @JonathanWilliamson

Added subscriber: @JonathanWilliamson

Added subscriber: @BartekMoniewski

Added subscriber: @BartekMoniewski

Added subscriber: @ionarn

Added subscriber: @ionarn

Added subscriber: @ideasman42

Added subscriber: @ideasman42

+1 for this proposal, Blender buttons already highlight when you move your house over them, (file browser too) so I'd consider this in keeping with existing UI design.

There area areas IMHO which are not at all clear (as noted in this proposal), Number fields are the most obvious example - other suggestions in this proposal I'd consider lower priority but still worth doing.

+1 for this proposal, Blender buttons already highlight when you move your house over them, (file browser too) so I'd consider this in keeping with existing UI design. There area areas IMHO which are not at all clear (as noted in this proposal), Number fields are the most obvious example - other suggestions in this proposal I'd consider lower priority but still worth doing.

This looks good to me.

This looks good to me.

Added subscriber: @michaelknubben

Added subscriber: @michaelknubben

Rather than completely hiding things such as the arrows, how about just dimming them? I find they're valuable in determining what type of field you're looking at. Is it a text-field that happens to contain numbers, is it a dropdown, is it a numeric field with arrows?

Rather than completely hiding things such as the arrows, how about just dimming them? I find they're valuable in determining what type of field you're looking at. Is it a text-field that happens to contain numbers, is it a dropdown, is it a numeric field with arrows?

Added subscriber: @PawelLyczkowski-1

Added subscriber: @PawelLyczkowski-1

Added subscriber: @mont29

Added subscriber: @mont29

Added subscriber: @forest-ka

Added subscriber: @forest-ka

Added subscriber: @Luarvik

Added subscriber: @Luarvik
Member

Added subscriber: @CodeManX

Added subscriber: @CodeManX
Member

This would make it clearer to the user what to expact (data input or increment/decrement step?) and solve the problem with arrow button area:

http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2014-February/042875.html

But the numbers are aligned to the right now, making the arrows on both sides look a odd / unbalanced. I tried to improve on billrey's mockup and reduce the distance needed to step up/down by moving the arrows next to each other (as seen on OSX for scrollbars for instance):

Widget_Rollover_Proposal.png

This would make it clearer to the user what to expact (data input or increment/decrement step?) and solve the problem with arrow button area: http://lists.blender.org/pipermail/bf-committers/2014-February/042875.html But the numbers are aligned to the right now, making the arrows on both sides look a odd / unbalanced. I tried to improve on billrey's mockup and reduce the distance needed to step up/down by moving the arrows next to each other (as seen on OSX for scrollbars for instance): ![Widget_Rollover_Proposal.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F78102/Widget_Rollover_Proposal.png)
Member

Added subscriber: @pablovazquez

Added subscriber: @pablovazquez
Member

Added subscriber: @plasmasolutions

Added subscriber: @plasmasolutions

Added subscriber: @natecraddock

Added subscriber: @natecraddock
Member

Added subscriber: @JulianEisel

Added subscriber: @JulianEisel

Added subscriber: @MikePan

Added subscriber: @MikePan

Added subscriber: @Januz

Added subscriber: @Januz
Julian Eisel self-assigned this 2015-02-18 16:58:57 +01:00

Removed subscriber: @natecraddock

Removed subscriber: @natecraddock

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'
Sign in to join this conversation.
18 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#38070
No description provided.