Equally Angle #43518

New Issue

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO · 2015-02-01T19:30:33+01:00

2015-02-01 19:30:33 +01:00

Project: Blender Extensions
Tracker: Py Scripts Upload
Blender: 2.7.x
Category: Mesh
Python: 3.4
Script name: equal_angles.py equal_angles.py
Wiki page: http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Modeling/Equal_Angles (english and spanish)
Author(s): Diego Quevedo (YHOYO)
Status: Open

this addon help you to split an angle in N equal parts

this is my first post, If something is wrong please tell me :D

best

**Project:** Blender Extensions **Tracker:** Py Scripts Upload **Blender:** 2.7.x **Category:** Mesh **Python:** 3.4 **Script name:** equal_angles.py [equal_angles.py](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F140302/equal_angles.py) **Wiki page:** http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensions:2.6/Py/Scripts/Modeling/Equal_Angles (english and spanish) **Author(s):** Diego Quevedo (YHOYO) **Status:** Open this addon help you to split an angle in N equal parts * this is my first post, If something is wrong please tell me :D best

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO commented

2015-02-01 19:30:33 +01:00

Changed status to: 'Open'

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO self-assigned this 2015-02-01 19:30:33 +01:00

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO commented

2015-02-01 19:30:33 +01:00

Added subscriber: @YHOYO

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO was unassigned by Sergey Sharybin

2015-02-03 09:36:32 +01:00

Sergey Sharybin commented

2015-02-03 09:36:32 +01:00

Added subscriber: @Sergey

Praful Raj Nimmagadda commented

2015-02-22 15:50:15 +01:00

Added subscriber: @Praful

Praharshita Krishna commented

2015-02-24 14:41:38 +01:00

Added subscriber: @Praharshita

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO commented

2015-04-01 19:55:13 +02:00

HI, I update this addon and work at 100% without bugs or limitations

[[ https://github.com/YHOYO/mesh_doshape_tools/blob/master/mesh_doshape_tools/equal_angles.py

equal_angles addon ]]

best

pd.. how decide what addon is add in blender release?

HI, I update this addon and work at 100% without bugs or limitations [[ https://github.com/YHOYO/mesh_doshape_tools/blob/master/mesh_doshape_tools/equal_angles.py | equal_angles addon ]] | -- | best pd.. how decide what addon is add in blender release?

Aaron Carlisle commented

2015-04-01 20:06:16 +02:00

Added subscriber: @Blendify

Aaron Carlisle commented

2015-04-01 20:06:16 +02:00

Basically if we have time to look over them and make sure that are set to our code standards

ronan ducluzeau commented

2015-04-11 14:24:48 +02:00

Added subscriber: @zeauro

ronan ducluzeau commented

2015-04-11 14:24:48 +02:00

From a user perspective, it seems weird.
You cut the whole mesh from an angle. It would be also interesting to be able to llimit it to a face.

IMHO, it should be a tool available in edge select mode.
Selecting edges instead of verts would benefit to get rid of checkboxes about a verts order that user have to remember.

With 2 edges selected, you directly see that the vertex shared by edges is the one where bisector acts.
Action is based on selection. You don't need extra click. Tool is faster and easier to use.

Invert name can be obscure. Don't you think that Tangent would be a better term ?

From a user perspective, it seems weird. You cut the whole mesh from an angle. It would be also interesting to be able to llimit it to a face. IMHO, it should be a tool available in edge select mode. Selecting edges instead of verts would benefit to get rid of checkboxes about a verts order that user have to remember. With 2 edges selected, you directly see that the vertex shared by edges is the one where bisector acts. Action is based on selection. You don't need extra click. Tool is faster and easier to use. Invert name can be obscure. Don't you think that Tangent would be a better term ?

DIEGO ALEXANDER QUEVEDO commented

2015-04-12 17:53:24 +02:00

In #43518#302028, @zeauro wrote:
From a user perspective, it seems weird.
You cut the whole mesh from an angle. It would be also interesting to be able to llimit it to a face.

IMHO, it should be a tool available in edge select mode.
Selecting edges instead of verts would benefit to get rid of checkboxes about a verts order that user have to remember.

With 2 edges selected, you directly see that the vertex shared by edges is the one where bisector acts.
Action is based on selection. You don't need extra click. Tool is faster and easier to use.

Invert name can be obscure. Don't you think that Tangent would be a better term ?

thanks for your answer

I will change "invert" to Tangent or out.... as you said is better

also, this tool was avalaible only to Edges, but after some test the best is with vertices

actually this tool only cut the unhide mesh, but I'll try to add the required functionality

thanks for all this help

Diego

> In #43518#302028, @zeauro wrote: > From a user perspective, it seems weird. > You cut the whole mesh from an angle. It would be also interesting to be able to llimit it to a face. > > IMHO, it should be a tool available in edge select mode. > Selecting edges instead of verts would benefit to get rid of checkboxes about a verts order that user have to remember. > > With 2 edges selected, you directly see that the vertex shared by edges is the one where bisector acts. > Action is based on selection. You don't need extra click. Tool is faster and easier to use. > > Invert name can be obscure. Don't you think that Tangent would be a better term ? thanks for your answer I will change "invert" to Tangent or out.... as you said is better also, this tool was avalaible only to Edges, but after some test the best is with vertices actually this tool only cut the unhide mesh, but I'll try to add the required functionality thanks for all this help Diego

Aaron Carlisle commented

2015-04-12 17:56:48 +02:00

Removed subscriber: @Blendify

Campbell Barton commented

2015-05-15 12:27:45 +02:00

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Campbell Barton closed this issue

2015-05-15 12:27:45 +02:00

Campbell Barton self-assigned this 2015-05-15 12:27:45 +02:00

Campbell Barton commented

2015-05-15 12:27:45 +02:00

Hi, this is similar to the triangle bisect addon, while its not useless, its a very specific function. Such tools are fine to develop, but not really for general usage.

closing.

Hi, this is similar to the triangle bisect addon, while its not useless, its a very specific function. Such tools are fine to develop, but not really for general usage. closing.

Sign in to join this conversation.