Use pypugjs for rendering #51156

New Issue

Francesco Siddi · 2017-04-08T12:59:14+02:00

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00

Currently we implement templates using pug and then use a gulp task to generate the HTML. By starting to use pypugjs :

designing and debugging templates becomes easier (debug display is closer to the source)
we simplify the pipeline by removing jade compilation (faster deploys and faster development preview)

This is a test run using index.html, extending layout.html (most of the current Blender Cloud pages have this level of complexity).

PUG

1st run:  0.13042s
next run: 0.00181s
next run: 0.00182s
next run: 0.00328s

HTML

1st run:  0.13313s
next run: 0.00177s
next run: 0.00234s
next run: 0.00393s

There seems to be no performance issue. The task would consist of:

renaming all .jade files to .pug and moving them from /src to /templates
introducing the new pypugjs requirement
updating the gulp script
updating the gitignore rules

Currently we implement templates using pug and then use a gulp task to generate the HTML. By starting to use [pypugjs ](https://github.com/matannoam/pypugjs): - designing and debugging templates becomes easier (debug display is closer to the source) - we simplify the pipeline by removing jade compilation (faster deploys and faster development preview) This is a test run using index.html, extending layout.html (most of the current Blender Cloud pages have this level of complexity). PUG ``` 1st run: 0.13042s next run: 0.00181s next run: 0.00182s next run: 0.00328s ``` HTML ``` 1st run: 0.13313s next run: 0.00177s next run: 0.00234s next run: 0.00393s ``` There seems to be no performance issue. The task would consist of: - renaming all .jade files to .pug and moving them from `/src` to `/templates` - introducing the new pypugjs requirement - updating the gulp script - updating the gitignore rules

Francesco Siddi self-assigned this 2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00

Changed status to: 'Open'

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-08 12:59:14 +02:00

Added subscriber: @fsiddi

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-08 16:38:56 +02:00

Added subscriber: @pablovazquez

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-11 11:25:26 +02:00

Changed status from 'Open' to: 'Archived'

Francesco Siddi closed this issue

2017-04-11 11:25:26 +02:00

Francesco Siddi commented

2017-04-11 11:25:26 +02:00

After some testing, this proved to be a failure. The lack of support for block elements inside of tags, combined with the lack of documentation and active support do not make this library suitable for Pillar.

Sign in to join this conversation.