Package manager design #52403

Closed
opened 2017-08-15 08:39:09 +02:00 by gandalf3 · 10 comments
Member

As the GSoC period comes to a close, I thought it would be a good idea to see where the UI stands.
I already got some design feedback from my prior progress video :

  • The Install/Documentation/Uninstall/Disable buttons should have the same height as a regular button
  • The position of these buttons should stay on the top-right when the add-on is expanded (to avoid jumping position of buttons)
  • Update to XX could perhaps just be called "Update". Number versions (and conventions) vary between add-ons, making the button different widths and making a bit of visual noise. We could display the version number available when expanded, and its changes (are we supporting changelog? That'd be awesome!).
  • The Enable button does the same as the checkbox in the regular add-ons list? Maybe we should just use the same familiar UI for that?
  • Refresh repositories should be triggered when adding a new repo maybe?

So, the current design of the package manager appears thusly:

examp255.png

As it is now, I already have a few concerns:

  • Not a lot of space for repository names, and no way for the user to resize that area (not counting resizing the window)
    • Perhaps the sidebar should be put in a region, so as to at least be user-resizeable?
  • Enable/disable checkbox make names of installed packages misalign with names of uninstalled packages.
    • This could be avoided by only showing uninstalled packages in "available", so that uninstalled and installed packages are never displayed in the same list. However, this has a side effect of removing any way to search all packages at once.
  • Not a lot of distinction between installed and uninstalled packages.
    • The checkbox only appears on installed packages, but isn't consistent; it can appear unchecked or checked.
    • The button text ("Install" vs "Uninstall") looks rather similar.

Any other observations and suggestions/recommendations?

As the GSoC period comes to a close, I thought it would be a good idea to see where the UI stands. I already got some design feedback from my [prior progress video ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_iBVNmeBdM&lc=z13hfndjmzqmtpe0p234vroyex3fgbovp): > * The Install/Documentation/Uninstall/Disable buttons should have the same height as a regular button > * The position of these buttons should stay on the top-right when the add-on is expanded (to avoid jumping position of buttons) > * Update to XX could perhaps just be called "Update". Number versions (and conventions) vary between add-ons, making the button different widths and making a bit of visual noise. We could display the version number available when expanded, and its changes (are we supporting changelog? That'd be awesome!). > * The Enable button does the same as the checkbox in the regular add-ons list? Maybe we should just use the same familiar UI for that? > * Refresh repositories should be triggered when adding a new repo maybe? So, the current design of the package manager appears thusly: ![examp255.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F712862/examp255.png) As it is now, I already have a few concerns: * Not a lot of space for repository names, and no way for the user to resize that area (not counting resizing the window) * Perhaps the sidebar should be put in a region, so as to at least be user-resizeable? * Enable/disable checkbox make names of installed packages misalign with names of uninstalled packages. * This could be avoided by only showing uninstalled packages in "available", so that uninstalled and installed packages are never displayed in the same list. However, this has a side effect of removing any way to search **all** packages at once. * Not a lot of distinction between installed and uninstalled packages. * The checkbox only appears on installed packages, but isn't consistent; it can appear unchecked or checked. * The button text ("Install" vs "Uninstall") looks rather similar. Any other observations and suggestions/recommendations?
Author
Member

Changed status to: 'Open'

Changed status to: 'Open'
Author
Member

Added subscriber: @gandalf3

Added subscriber: @gandalf3
Member

Added subscriber: @BrendonMurphy

Added subscriber: @BrendonMurphy
Member

hi, this looks really good, simple and clear for users.

"Not a lot of space for repository names, and no way for the user to resize that area (not counting resizing the window)"
The 3 bars at the window bottom allow to expand the panel.
This works well with the categories in the template list box.
There's also a function to add arrows up/down like seen in the vertex group template list box. (when the item number exceeds the length the up/down buttons appear)

"Enable/disable checkbox make names of installed packages misalign with names of uninstalled packages. This could be avoided by only showing uninstalled packages in "available", so that uninstalled and installed packages are never displayed in the same list. However, this has a side effect of removing any way to search all packages at once. "
I think this is ok, there will be many many addons and room to move will be important.

"Not a lot of distinction between installed and uninstalled packages.
The checkbox only appears on installed packages, but isn't consistent; it can appear unchecked or checked. The button text ("Install" vs "Uninstall") looks rather similar."
I did notice the lack of icon use, icons could be used here also.
Thanks, looks good so far.

hi, this looks really good, simple and clear for users. "Not a lot of space for repository names, and no way for the user to resize that area (not counting resizing the window)" The 3 bars at the window bottom allow to expand the panel. This works well with the categories in the template list box. There's also a function to add arrows up/down like seen in the vertex group template list box. (when the item number exceeds the length the up/down buttons appear) "Enable/disable checkbox make names of installed packages misalign with names of uninstalled packages. This could be avoided by only showing uninstalled packages in "available", so that uninstalled and installed packages are never displayed in the same list. However, this has a side effect of removing any way to search all packages at once. " I think this is ok, there will be many many addons and room to move will be important. "Not a lot of distinction between installed and uninstalled packages. The checkbox only appears on installed packages, but isn't consistent; it can appear unchecked or checked. The button text ("Install" vs "Uninstall") looks rather similar." I did notice the lack of icon use, icons could be used here also. Thanks, looks good so far.
Member

Added subscriber: @Blendify

Added subscriber: @Blendify
Author
Member

The 3 bars at the window bottom allow to expand the panel.
This works well with the categories in the template list box.
There's also a function to add arrows up/down like seen in the vertex group template list box. (when the item number exceeds the length the up/down buttons appear)

Ah, I mean horizontal space. You can see that the (rather long) name of the second repository (Official Addons (blendermonkey testing)) has been cut off.

I think this is ok, there will be many many addons and room to move will be important.

Not sure what you mean? (room to move what?)

I did notice the lack of icon use, icons could be used here also.

Good point. Maybe a green check (FILE_TICK) on installed packages?

> The 3 bars at the window bottom allow to expand the panel. > This works well with the categories in the template list box. > There's also a function to add arrows up/down like seen in the vertex group template list box. (when the item number exceeds the length the up/down buttons appear) Ah, I mean horizontal space. You can see that the (rather long) name of the second repository (`Official Addons (blendermonkey testing)`) has been cut off. > I think this is ok, there will be many many addons and room to move will be important. Not sure what you mean? (room to move what?) > I did notice the lack of icon use, icons could be used here also. Good point. Maybe a green check (`FILE_TICK`) on installed packages?
Member

Added subscriber: @JohnRoper

Added subscriber: @JohnRoper

Added subscriber: @brecht

Added subscriber: @brecht

For repositories horizontal space, it could be behind an extra tab, and then repositories could be in a list similar to addons with more space for description, URLs, searching, etc. Disadvantage is that it is more hidden in the UI.

Available Installed Updates Repositories

Otherwise, it seems quite reasonable to make the left area wider.

For repositories horizontal space, it could be behind an extra tab, and then repositories could be in a list similar to addons with more space for description, URLs, searching, etc. Disadvantage is that it is more hidden in the UI. |Available|Installed|Updates| |Repositories| | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | Otherwise, it seems quite reasonable to make the left area wider.
Philipp Oeser removed the
Interest
User Interface
label 2023-02-10 09:26:24 +01:00
Member

It looks like the extensions platform is the current take on this area. I'll close this task since it isn't relevant anymore.

It looks like the extensions platform is the current take on this area. I'll close this task since it isn't relevant anymore.
Blender Bot added
Status
Archived
and removed
Status
Confirmed
labels 2024-03-03 04:51:42 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#52403
No description provided.