Package manager design #52403
Labels
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender#52403
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
As the GSoC period comes to a close, I thought it would be a good idea to see where the UI stands.
I already got some design feedback from my prior progress video :
So, the current design of the package manager appears thusly:
As it is now, I already have a few concerns:
Any other observations and suggestions/recommendations?
Changed status to: 'Open'
Added subscriber: @gandalf3
Added subscriber: @BrendonMurphy
hi, this looks really good, simple and clear for users.
"Not a lot of space for repository names, and no way for the user to resize that area (not counting resizing the window)"
The 3 bars at the window bottom allow to expand the panel.
This works well with the categories in the template list box.
There's also a function to add arrows up/down like seen in the vertex group template list box. (when the item number exceeds the length the up/down buttons appear)
"Enable/disable checkbox make names of installed packages misalign with names of uninstalled packages. This could be avoided by only showing uninstalled packages in "available", so that uninstalled and installed packages are never displayed in the same list. However, this has a side effect of removing any way to search all packages at once. "
I think this is ok, there will be many many addons and room to move will be important.
"Not a lot of distinction between installed and uninstalled packages.
The checkbox only appears on installed packages, but isn't consistent; it can appear unchecked or checked. The button text ("Install" vs "Uninstall") looks rather similar."
I did notice the lack of icon use, icons could be used here also.
Thanks, looks good so far.
Added subscriber: @Blendify
Ah, I mean horizontal space. You can see that the (rather long) name of the second repository (
Official Addons (blendermonkey testing)
) has been cut off.Not sure what you mean? (room to move what?)
Good point. Maybe a green check (
FILE_TICK
) on installed packages?Added subscriber: @JohnRoper
Added subscriber: @brecht
For repositories horizontal space, it could be behind an extra tab, and then repositories could be in a list similar to addons with more space for description, URLs, searching, etc. Disadvantage is that it is more hidden in the UI.
Otherwise, it seems quite reasonable to make the left area wider.
It looks like the extensions platform is the current take on this area. I'll close this task since it isn't relevant anymore.