bmesh.ops.subdivide_edges doesn't report all inner edges in 'geom_inner' #83926

Open
opened 2020-12-18 12:40:18 +01:00 by Stanislav Blinov · 5 comments

Blender Version
Broken: 2.91, 2.92 master
Worked: never?

Short description of error

I'm not sure if it's a bug or if there's some underlying reason for this behavior. The BMesh subdivide edges op returns three lists of geometry, one of which is 'geom_inner'. It appears that this list doesn't always contain all new 'inner' edges. This depends on the topology being passed to the op. Example image, created from the attached blend file:

image.png

On the left is the original selection of edges being passed in to the op, and on the right - selection of edges from the resulting 'geom_inner' list. As you can see, some of the edges aren't selected (i.e. they were not present in the list). We can work around this by iterating all vertices from 'geom_inner' list, and taking all edges linked to them that are not also part of the 'geom_split' list returned by the op, but it feels like this information should just be provided in the 'geom_inner' list.

Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Load the attached file and run the script.

subdivide_geom_inner_issue.blend

**Blender Version** Broken: 2.91, 2.92 master Worked: never? **Short description of error** I'm not sure if it's a bug or if there's some underlying reason for this behavior. The [BMesh subdivide edges op ](https://docs.blender.org/api/current/bmesh.ops.html#bmesh.ops.subdivide_edges) returns three lists of geometry, one of which is 'geom_inner'. It appears that this list doesn't always contain all new 'inner' edges. This depends on the topology being passed to the op. Example image, created from the attached blend file: ![image.png](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9516365/image.png) On the left is the original selection of edges being passed in to the op, and on the right - selection of edges from the resulting 'geom_inner' list. As you can see, some of the edges aren't selected (i.e. they were not present in the list). We can work around this by iterating all **vertices** from 'geom_inner' list, and taking all edges linked to them that are not also part of the 'geom_split' list returned by the op, but it feels like this information should just be provided in the 'geom_inner' list. **Exact steps for others to reproduce the error** Load the attached file and run the script. [subdivide_geom_inner_issue.blend](https://archive.blender.org/developer/F9516370/subdivide_geom_inner_issue.blend)

Added subscriber: @Stan_Pancakes

Added subscriber: @Stan_Pancakes
Member

Added subscribers: @ideasman42, @lichtwerk

Added subscribers: @ideasman42, @lichtwerk
Member

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'

Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Confirmed'
Philipp Oeser self-assigned this 2021-01-06 15:13:52 +01:00
Member

Checked on this and here are my findings:

  • the edges currently marked with geom_inner (the "working" ones) are from a special case in bmo_subdivide_edges_exec where no SubDPattern is available for the SubDFaceData
  • for the remaining cases where the pattern-based edge subdivider creates those "missing" edges edges are not flagged ELE_INNER
  • there are many different patterns, but afaict, the fundamental operation in all of them is connect_smallest_face, so easiest solution would be to flag new edges there
  • (or maybe this needs more flexibility in that one could pass in which flag to use? made optional entirely?)

Will post a Diff shortly

CC @ideasman42

Checked on this and here are my findings: - the edges currently marked with `geom_inner` (the "working" ones) are from a special case in `bmo_subdivide_edges_exec` where no `SubDPattern` is available for the `SubDFaceData` - for the remaining cases where the pattern-based edge subdivider creates those "missing" edges edges are not flagged `ELE_INNER` - there are many different patterns, but afaict, the fundamental operation in all of them is `connect_smallest_face`, so easiest solution would be to flag new edges there - (or maybe this needs more flexibility in that one could pass in which flag to use? made optional entirely?) Will post a Diff shortly CC @ideasman42
Philipp Oeser removed their assignment 2022-01-18 21:18:16 +01:00
Member

Will have to concentrate on triaging for a while (and step down).

Will have to concentrate on triaging for a while (and step down).
Philipp Oeser removed the
Interest
Modeling
label 2023-02-09 15:28:45 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: blender/blender#83926
No description provided.