Scaling Grease Pencil Strokes in Edit Mode Scales Thickness #93163
Labels
No Label
Interest
Alembic
Interest
Animation & Rigging
Interest
Asset Browser
Interest
Asset Browser Project Overview
Interest
Audio
Interest
Automated Testing
Interest
Blender Asset Bundle
Interest
BlendFile
Interest
Collada
Interest
Compatibility
Interest
Compositing
Interest
Core
Interest
Cycles
Interest
Dependency Graph
Interest
Development Management
Interest
EEVEE
Interest
EEVEE & Viewport
Interest
Freestyle
Interest
Geometry Nodes
Interest
Grease Pencil
Interest
ID Management
Interest
Images & Movies
Interest
Import Export
Interest
Line Art
Interest
Masking
Interest
Metal
Interest
Modeling
Interest
Modifiers
Interest
Motion Tracking
Interest
Nodes & Physics
Interest
OpenGL
Interest
Overlay
Interest
Overrides
Interest
Performance
Interest
Physics
Interest
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Interest
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Interest
Python API
Interest
Render & Cycles
Interest
Render Pipeline
Interest
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Interest
Text Editor
Interest
Translations
Interest
Triaging
Interest
Undo
Interest
USD
Interest
User Interface
Interest
UV Editing
Interest
VFX & Video
Interest
Video Sequencer
Interest
Virtual Reality
Interest
Vulkan
Interest
Wayland
Interest
Workbench
Interest: X11
Legacy
Blender 2.8 Project
Legacy
Milestone 1: Basic, Local Asset Browser
Legacy
OpenGL Error
Meta
Good First Issue
Meta
Papercut
Meta
Retrospective
Meta
Security
Module
Animation & Rigging
Module
Core
Module
Development Management
Module
EEVEE & Viewport
Module
Grease Pencil
Module
Modeling
Module
Nodes & Physics
Module
Pipeline, Assets & IO
Module
Platforms, Builds & Tests
Module
Python API
Module
Render & Cycles
Module
Sculpt, Paint & Texture
Module
Triaging
Module
User Interface
Module
VFX & Video
Platform
FreeBSD
Platform
Linux
Platform
macOS
Platform
Windows
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Normal
Priority
Unbreak Now!
Status
Archived
Status
Confirmed
Status
Duplicate
Status
Needs Info from Developers
Status
Needs Information from User
Status
Needs Triage
Status
Resolved
Type
Bug
Type
Design
Type
Known Issue
Type
Patch
Type
Report
Type
To Do
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: blender/blender#93163
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
System Information
Operating system: Windows-10-10.0.19042-SP0 64 Bits
Graphics card: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070/PCIe/SSE2 NVIDIA Corporation 4.5.0 NVIDIA 496.49
Blender Version
Broken: version: 3.0.0 Beta, branch: master, commit date: 2021-11-05 22:17, hash:
7a5b8cb202Short description of error
When going into edit mode, then duplicating GP strokes and mirroring them, the line thickness changes as well. It didn't used to be this way.
Exact steps for others to reproduce the error
Open .blend file, select GP object, tab into edit mode, select strokes, press "s" to scale, then "x" to limit to x-axis, then "-1" to invert strokes, and examine my pain.
Test File:
new.blend
Added subscriber: @Miguel-Cardenas
It occurs to me that this may be a feature and not a bug, but blender didn't used to operate this way. Please let me know if I'm mistaken!
Added subscriber: @PratikPB2123
Added subscriber: @frogstomp-4
@Miguel-Cardenas there is scale thickness option you need to untick, report back please if that solved it so we can close the task
alternatively, you could also "r z 180"
Added subscriber: @antoniov
This is the commit that changed behavior:
https://developer.blender.org/rB6fc92b296fae
Also described in release notes:
https://wiki.blender.org/wiki/Reference/Release_Notes/3.0/Grease_Pencil
"Use Scale Thickness option is now enabled by default in 2D template. (
6fc92b296f)"CC @antoniov
Added subscriber: @lichtwerk
Changed status from 'Needs Triage' to: 'Needs Developer To Reproduce'
Generally, this might be an intentional change, BUT:
I think negative scaling should not scale the thickness like that? Should this use an absolute value?
This issue was referenced by
784c04bcbdThis issue was referenced by
49a18cc91eChanged status from 'Needs Developer To Reproduce' to: 'Resolved'